http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/758897.html
This seems like a violation of her civil rights. It's a public school, not a private one. School could twist the "distraction" clause to include speech or any number of other things too if they wished. Could definitely go too far. It's still her body, under her parent's jurisdiction, she has the right to dye, pierce or tattoo any portion she wishes.
Thoughts?
Tags: