2 Big Bangs? No idiots and plz explain your answer?

Question

Ok is it really beliveable that just out of no where something banged and puffff the universe started , the only really theory i belive is that there was a previous universe that collased and contracted to grow into the universe that we know live in. theres no telling how many times this could have happend, it could have been the first or the 759034265349760 time its happend but that could explain de ja vu since some things are bound to repeat themselves, want do you think?

Answer 1

Big Bang / Singularity / Eternity as one in the same. Simply a Theory.

In a nut shell Synopsis: As the universe expands, and galaxies collide and form bigger and bigger black holes over billions of years, the entire universe will one day be compressed into one singularity. Then, I believe the force will be too great, and the energy within will be forced to release again, causing another big bang. And so on, and so on, and so on, and so on . . . . . . . I think the universe is like a balloon that you blow up, then let the air out of, then blow up again, and let the air out again . . . symbolically speaking. This lends to the term, Eternity. This process never stops and I believe there are an infinite number of these occurrences and a possible multi-verse occurrence as well. The problem with understanding this is that the human mind has a hard time conceiving the notion of eternity because everywhere we turn in our environment, we encounter boundaries. I truly believe that at the state we are, as humans, we cannot yet understand the great scientists' methods for making all of this work in harmony.

Another acceptable theory to me is the Fecund Universes Theory (also called cosmological natural selection theory) of cosmology advanced by Lee Smolin suggests that the rules of biology apply on the grandest scales, and is often referred to as "cosmological natural selection". Smolin summarized the idea in a book aimed at a lay audience called The Life of the Cosmos.

The theory surmises that a collapsing black hole causes the emergence of a new universe on the "other side", whose fundamental constant parameters (speed of light, Planck length and so forth) may differ slightly from those of the universe where the black hole collapsed. Each universe therefore gives rise to as many new universes as it has black holes. Thus the theory contains the evolutionary ideas of "reproduction" and "mutation" of universes, but has no direct analogue of natural selection. However, given any universe that can produce black holes that successfully spawn new universes, it is possible that some number of those universes will reach heat death with unsuccessful parameters. So, in a sense, fecundity cosmological natural selection is one where universes could die off before successfully reproducing, just as any human can die without having children.

Answer 2

Well, It has been proven that the universe will come to a point where it stops expanding and begins the long road back to a mustard seed. It is plausable that this isnt the first time it has exploded. However, Scientist can only trace history back to the millionth of a second after the 'big bang'. Think of a star. In a stars life, it begins from dust and other elements. As the life cycle goes on it burns itself into heavier elements and collects c**p that passes to close Helium, Oxygen, Hydrogen, all eventually turn into Iorn, copper, and all that jazz. The star gets soooo massive that there is an incomprehendable gravity. The Nuclear Fiusion inside counteracts the gravity until the fusion stoppes because it has burned itself into elements that can no longer give energy. Gravity pulls the star into itself. When the pressure gets to strong, it explodes. Durring this explosion(super nova) all the elements go out into space and some are ripped apart into basic elements again. These basic elements are the starting point for another star to be born. Hope that helps.

De ja vu is a random firing of your cerebral cortex where memories are stored. This causes a confusion and you think that what is happening is a memory. How many times has anyone ever remembered before the incodent and changed it. By the time you think' Oh c**p! De ja vu!.. Its gone. Just happens. Nothing to do with the universe.

Answer 3

an expanding cosmos does not explain the big bang. nor does it  give it validity. ah nature, the king and queen of illusion.

as far as an oscillating cosmological model is concerned that is more in line with the rig veda than anything else. ironically, the oldest known cosmological beliefs come from the hindu's. however, as far as an oscillating cosmological model is concerned it seems to me highly improbable and in many respects somewhat silly. cosmology is a highly venerable field, but one thing it is not is a theme park.

p.s. - by the way i would be weary of who asks these kinds of questions on yahoo or anywhere... you never who it could be....some one looking to steal... or any number of things. carve your own path people.

Answer 4

It's distinctly possible that our universe 'budded' off of another universe.

It's entirely possible that our universe is 'budding' other universes of its own.

They're theories.

Answer 5

The point is that its unexplained either way, we have no idea where the matter from the big bang or the multiple collapses you described came from.  Because this is true, and we have no observable evidence of your theory, its more logical to believe the big Bang theory becuase it has direct evidence and is the simplest creationt heory with evidence.  Think of Occam's Razor, whatever is the simplest is more likely to be the truth.  Since both your theory and the normal Big Bang theory both have no part in how they came to being exactly, its simpler to say that the normal Big Bang was more likely to happen.

Answer 6

Plausible. But I guess until we know for certain what happened AT the big bang, we won't know what came before it will we?

Answer 7

A theory is based on available information which is added to as time progresses ...so even a theory must often evolve as mankind learns and adds to the total knowledge... we have not been alive long enough to have more than a minimum understanding of the possibilities ....

Answer 8

As there's no such thing as time, then 759034265349760 Big Bangs are as One, any-way!

Answer 9

Explain Deja vu?  No.  Scientist believe they have already found what causes deja vu.  It was in a time article, I will explain when I find it.  However, some people do speculate the universe is in fact is repeating itself with a big bang and big crunch.  However, we still have no proof on such a theory.  The big bang, while it gives a logical explanation, still is considered a theory itself.  To top it all off, scientists believe that the big crunch, originally widely accepted as a end of the universe theory, is showing signs of not happening, and that we are most likely headed to a big freeze-when all the matter of the universe keeps expanding, stars burn out and die, there is no light, no matter left to make stars, and the universe freezes over.