4 Homeruns in 1 game or hitting 6 for 6? Which u think is harder to Acheive?

Question

4 Homeruns in 1 game or hitting 6 for 6? Which u think is harder to Acheive?

Answer 1

4 home runs in one game.  Stats have backed it up.

And the 4 home runs is already 4 of the 6 hits.

all u need to do is go 2 for 2 more to get 6 for 6.

Answer 2

Well, it depends what type of player you are. If you are like an Ichiro, definitely a 4 homer game, but if you're a Ryan Howard who hit 58 in a year and you're mainly made of power, not timing, obviously a 6 for 6

Answer 3

4 home runs in a game. hitting 6 for 6 just needs some contact but hitting 4 home runs in a game needs alot of power.

Answer 4

4 homerrund in 1 game

Answer 5

Probably 6 for 6 becuase its the whole team has to be doing good for you to get 6 at bats.

Answer 6

Wow hitting 4hr in one game  

Answer 7

4 Home Runs in One Game

that is Crazy!

Answer 8

Getting a Home Run is Hard enough but to do that in a Game is pretty impressive, but then again getting a hit is also hard. Think about this 4 home runs in a game has been done in a game 15 times while 6 hits in a game has been done 31 times.

Answer 9

4 Home runs by Favre

Answer 10

think 6 for 6 because if they hadnt walked him by the 6th at bat his lucky

Answer 11

Wow, tough call!!! But I will say the four HR's would be tougher. TO be honest, I don't really have any logic behind thinking that way.

Answer 12

both are tough, but there have been a lot of players to hit 4 in a row, but 6 hits in a game is d**n near impossible these days.  My vote goes to being 6 for 6, its harder than people think.

Answer 13

well I think there's less chance of hitting 6for6 because batters dont usually get 6 at bats in a game.  So even though it might be a little "easier" then 4 homers its probably less likely

Answer 14

for 1 player? hittings 4 homeruns in one game. johnny damon hit 6 for 6 this year vs the royals

Answer 15

I would say 4 home runs because going 6 for 6 includes any type of hit. They are both uncommon though

Answer 16

That is an "apples and oranges"type of question

Naturally it is harder to hit four dingers but 6 for 6 will put you in the record books of your team irregardless.Both are feats for the books but keep in mind that folks love the home run.The old adage is defense wins but offense fills the seats.I myself think that 6-6 is as incredible as four home runs.That being said,how about hitting for the cycle?

Answer 17

hitting 6 for 6.  

Answer 18

It has to be 4 home runs in a game because once you get two home runs, the pitchers are going to be very cautious with you. They may not even pitch close to the plate in fear of you hitting a homer. Then, after you get your third homer, hitting a 4th is even harder. 6-6 is a bit easier, because those hits may not do much damage but with 4 HRs, you get at least 4 RBIs

Answer 19

It can be wither way. It depends how their building is built. Someone on my little league team for juniors had three homeruns in one game and went 4 for 4

You cant answer this question at all. It is impossible to answer because it all depends how someones body is built.

Answer 20

How many players can say they hit 6 for 6??  i think thats harder to do then hit 4 homers runs...whats the chances of batting 6 times in one game...you at least get 4 at bats in a game

Answer 21

Wow both are amazingly difficult, so I don't want to take away from either one of those, but if you really have to choose I would say hitting 4 homeruns. I mean you gotta get the perfect pitches while going 6 for 6 you could just be really hot and be hitting anything they are throwing up there. I just think it's a little harder to take a good pitcher's pitch and hit a homerun.

Good question!

Answer 22

6 for 6 simply for the fact that you have to go to bat 6 times.  Not only do you need to get a hit each time but your team has to do as a whole well enough to allow to have 6 ad bats.

4 ad bats is more reasonable to get.