9/11 CT's are you intimidated by being called names?

Question

I've noticed a lot of name-calling on YA... mostly aimed at "truthers". In the government section anyways.

Does this intimidate you?

Answer 1

No it doesn't bother me most of the name callers prove very quickly that they don't know what they are talking about. I got bashed one time for saying that three building came down at the

WTC plaza. I was told that only two came down.  Most still think that a combustion fire could melt steel. They don't realize that the two government reports don't agree.

Answer 2

To quote Free Thinking Patriot from the last Q I answered:

"As you will notice... people from the 9/11 "truthers" persuasion are typically more informed and more polite as well. We don't need to call people names who disagree with us... because we have the facts on our side."

I also like syn's answer. The fact that there is groupthink behavior going on here that causes people to get riled up and hurl insults whenever someone simply asks (perfectly legitimate) questions... should be sort of a red flag for anyone with their head on straight.

Without questions, we would have no answers!

And to those hurling the insults... if "truthers" are just tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists, then why do you feel so threatened by what we have to say? I mean, some of you are calling for our executions! Don't you think that's a little extreme for just a "crazy kook" with "fringe" theories?

Well, maybe it's a little scarier for you now that the latest Scripps Howard polls show that over 110 million americans (36%) believe that 9/11 was an inside job... and 84% question the official story.

I think they're just upset because their side is losing.

We won't hold it against you if you admit you were wrong and want to change sides NOW, but in another couple months... no promises :P

Edit: ROB, I have seen some people calling them "the 9/11 Gullible"

Answer 3

I am open minded enough to discuss things in detail, and ask questions and look for answers!

I find that when people start name calling it is because they know that they are unable to sustain there argument further!

Answer 4

Sticks and stones. It ain't nothing but a thing. It's always the ones who start the name calling who haven't a clue what they are talking about.

Answer 5

No, not at all.

We are (at least supposed to be) a free nation, and that means we each are entitled to our own views, and opinions. If they don't like my ideas that is their option, and freedom, for as long as we remain free.

9/11 is a very emotional subject. We as Americans lost some of our own on that day. Many can't accept, or believe that our government ever would 'allow' it's citizens to be killed.

However, look at what our government gained from it. When 9/11 happened, the government got the green light which they were wanting, to go after all the nations which won't go along with their plan (One world government). (If this is NWO thing is a conspiracy, then why won't they build the border fence?). The American people would not have supported two wars (soon to be three-Iran-) without a Pearl Harbor sized attack happening. Isn't it odd...just a little that NOTHING has happened on US soil since?

Iraq was not threatening us, or a threat to us, yet we somehow linked this to 9/11, and invaded on the premise of the threat of terrorism by WMD's which didn't even exist. Hmm...Maybe their right! I am an idiot for thinking, and using common sense!

Answer 6

I don't consider myself to be a conspiracy theorist.  I consider myself to be a person who does not believe the government's official fairy tale.  The evidence for government lying is convincing and that alone justifies a new and impartial investigation.

Sometimes the pro-criminal government people call me names.  I find it amusing because the name calling is usually the entire substance of their arguments.  

The name-calling does not intimidate me because I am confident knowing the majority believe the government is lying.

When I speak with "newbie" truth seekers, I encourage them to be tentative about adopting alternate theories for details of the events of 9-11, such as the demolitions theory.  What is most important is the evidence for government complicity and an understanding of the motivation behind the false flag.  When focusing on those issues, it is easier to speak up without being labeled by the children.

I encourage the name-callers to continue the childish behavior.  It works against their cause of defending the criminals inside the government.  They look like uneducated, bumbling idiots who cannot form a full sentence without the word "tin foil" or some other derogatory term.  

As they are in the minority now.  I was thinking it would be good to create a new term to label those people, and see if it takes root.  It would be handy for answering questions to have a one or two-word description for those people and have other users know instantly what you mean.  

Any ideas?  Maybe someone should ask that question here!   My idea - "9-11 Sleepers".  The name "9-11 Skeptics" implies credibility, and for that reason it is not a good term for those people.  "9-11 Skeptic" is a good term for skeptics that provide intelligent, respectful arguments without stooping to name-calling.

Answer 7

Not bothered at all.

In fact, it proves that the ones calling the names have nothing intelligent to say.  It's a common technique of the debunkers to scare off others who may be undecided on the 9/11 issue.  I think that most people have more sense than that.. and can see right through them.

Answer 8

No. How can someone who calls himself the Ring of Uranus be bothered by name calling :o)

And besides, all of the 'real' people I know, even the ones most adamant that no sinister rather than terrorist motives could be behind 9/11 and 7/7 have started to notice that many of the motives behind the plots us tinfoil hat wearing, kool aid drink'n, fruit loops said were behind the attacks are actually beginning to get to obvious for them to ignore.

If folks on here are comforted in their belief that their governments wouldn't consider them to be pawns in a game for absolute power, with its and not their welfare and best interests at heart like every major player on the world stage for thousands of years, then let them enjoy the comfort.

There's precious little to be happy about in the world today, so I wouldn't wish to insist they come out of their T.V. induced coma's on my account.

Answer 9

Nope but I am not a "truther"  they belong to groups and groups are notorious for starting out one way and ending up following the strongest "leader"....human nature (oops a theory)

Besides the words are not wrong. Theory is not a bad word and conspiracies exist. Merely suspecting something on the basis of evidence or behaviors doesn't brand you a kook. If so we would have no scientists, investigative journalists, historical scholars and writers etc etc....

Answer 10

No, it doesn't. Those who are namecalling are either brainwashed or they are paid to post those kind of comments here to discourage people from asking questions about 9/11. If we get intimidated, then they win.

Answer 11

ya, the fact that all the opposition can do is attack and call names, just points to the fact that they have no argument, otherwise they would debate like adults.

Answer 12

No.It just drives home a point when people name call.