A question about dominant and recessive genes.?

Question

This is a controversial question, but I hope you can bear with me. I was wondering about this because a lot of racists are on YA. And they keep saying that Africans and other minorities are somehow genetically and anthropologically inferior. If that is true, why are African and Asian genes dominant? If they were really inferior, why would nature seek to make their genes stronger? Thanks.

Answer 1

People need to stop it with the b.s. idea that eventually we will all be the same color brown. IT IS RIDICULOUS! A common understanding of the effects of geography on DNA will imply the sillyness of this idea... which it seems is only a way for people to avid dealing with issues of [not the the other divisive and harmful concept of 'race' but] discrimination. AND: the idea of race isnt the worst thing. Simply it can be used to efficiently describe physical characteristics. The problem arises when power hungriness influences people to attribute moral differences to those physical characteristics, and create divisions of heirarchy defines not by social and interpersonal behavior, but the behavior of DNA in response to the environment. We are all HUMAN so people whenever you encounter a case of US against THEM, think twice. We are too sophisticated as individuals for our wholistic needs to be manipulated so daftly.  Get it together my cousins. Pay attention when you go to school, and pick up book to read in your spare time.