A serious question here?

Question

was this pish about gough started by some of us celtic fans as a counter to the big jock nonsense doing the rounds? im not trying to antagonize folk here, but who thinks these up? cheers

Answer 1

Yes it probably was, but rangers fans never made the big jock knew thing up

Answer 2

Serious answer G/bob. Forget about this line of questioning. It belongs to an idiot audience and regurgitating it's poor content is giving credence to fools.

Scratch this before you start a brushfire on this inane subject. Just know that it is all about point scoring and the only ones who are hurt are the victims.......again.

Let's see how many idiots like this clown small tool below me, come in with a sound bite like he has. Shame on you foolish boy.

Answer 3

better off ignoring the twats as they are just as bad as bjk mob  

Answer 4

Any1 who takes part in all this cr*p from either side is nothing but a sick minded low life scum bag!!

Answer 5

it's a point scoring thing...Celtic fans who chant this c**p are not Celtic supporters they are Rangers haters. same goes for the BJK people.

who on earth wants to watch a match and have their head filled with CA songs ready to sing?

sick

Answer 6

The ones who spout on about this rubbish are sub human.No souls or respect for anything.

As you say in Scotland pure bawbags & neds.

Answer 7

I think the rumour was maliciously started after Richard Gough suffered from Hepatitis B. I don't know when this was.

I heard the rumour when he still played for Rangers,I've never known anyone who's taken it seriously.

Answer 8

BJK

Answer 9

Good Q and it deserves a good A however I don't want to waste to much time on the clowns that say these kind of t*t for tat Q's because they have no brain and just want to upset folk.As it brought the subject to light have a star.

glad to say I don't know what  large tool means with BJK.

Answer 10

I think you will find this kind of thing does wind people up not because of the question or the way it is asked, just purely because it gives those who ask a platform and that in itself is fundamentally wrong.

I wonder if it the law were to intervene and ask them to prove what they are spouting is true and if they could not prove it ,charges were then brought against them for maliciousness and if found guilty 12 months in the jug would be warranted, would they still persist with these questions.

Good question though.