than they would have had if they'd been raised by their first parents?
For us, we don't believe we are giving our daughter "a better life" then she would have had if she'd been with her parents in China. We consider it just a different life. However, with our new son (foster care), due to the abuse, we do in fact believe (or hope) it will be better with us.
The reason I am asking is I know most parents who are raising biological children want the absolute best for their kids and want them to experience things, but I'm wondering if APs and even PAPs feel an actual responsibility to make that happen... and in what ways.
For example. My kids are only 3 and 2, but I feel very strongly that they shoul go to university. Hubby reminds me that they might want to do a trade or be actors, painters or rock stars, but I said that they just had to go to university. When he said why, I blurted out because "we promised!" Well, we didn't actually promise anything of the sort, but I felt I owed it somehow to the first families (particularly to my daughter's) that they would have this experience. Obviously I would never force them to go to university; I was just shocked at how intense that feeling was.
There are other things as well as that I want them to experience, it's just that while many biological parents may have a wish list, I almost have a "must provide" list.
Anyone else?
Also, to the adoptees: Do you know if your parents made certain promises to your first parents about a "better life."
Tags: