According the supporters of illegals should the police of arrested her since this falls under better life ?

Question

She then passed a fraudulent Illinois Identification Card and Social Security Card to the clerk. The clerk immediately recognized the cards as fraudulent.

Garcia was questioned about the cards and admitted to purchasing them for $180 two years ago, then essentially assuming the identity of the individual.

She now faces two counts of forgery and one count of identity fraud.

She was booked into the Butler County Jail, but faces deportation back to Mexico after she answers to her state charges.

Answer 1

you didnt even give all of the articule.what was she trying to buy it says she passed it to a clerk.at least add a link.then i will edit and give my opinion.

Answer 2

That is what they say. Sweep it under the rug.Out of sight .Out of mind

Answer 3

Muy señores, el tabaco se cultivaba mucho antes de la llegada de los españoles

Answer 4

that is AGAINST THE LAW!!  if we was to do that the same thing would happen to us.

AND she is illegal, which is breaking the law also.

identity theft and forgery is WRONG.  would you want it to happen to you?  

i didn't think so

Answer 5

Alright I'll start with a link to the crime of stupidity. You only gave the last half of the story. The best part was what job she was applying for.

HAMILTON, OH -- An illegal immigrant in Butler County was arrested on Wednesday after she walked into the Sheriff's Office looking to apply for a job.

http://www.14wfie.com/Global/story.asp?S...

But you also got to talk about this guy too. Scum of scum, he is not just out for work he was making mad money for awhile.

Daniel Parrilli created his own little business. He even created the customers.

Parrilli applied for credit cards in fictitious names. Then he set up a sham company and secured a credit card terminal. He processed transactions through the terminal using the bogus cards and deposited the sales credits into bank accounts set up with the aliases. For a while, he paid minimum balances on the cards to keep them in good standing.

By the time investigators caught up with Parrilli two years ago, he had raked in an estimated $600,000. He had purchased property, vehicles and a boat for himself and his family.

“It never ceases to amaze me the ingenuity of people in how far they’ll go to create schemes,” says Victor Demtschenko, a postal inspector who investigated the case. “The effort that’s put forth by some white-collar criminals is amazing. This guy, besides working a full-time job, was full-time involved in fraud.”

Parrilli was diligent at executing his schemes. In his Carol Stream home, investigators found files for each of the fictitious identities he had created, complete with corresponding credit cards — about 250 — and copies of credit card applications. “He had backup documentation for everything, which was really nice for us,” Demtschenko says.

Parrilli had worked as a credit manager for a major department store. When he left that job, he took some 30 credit reports. He then paired Social Security numbers from those reports with phony names, creating the 24 aliases he used to get the credit cards.

One of his victims complained to the Social Security Administration that his Social Security number was being used by somebody else. That led the agency’s investigators, and those of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, to Parrilli.

“We know of at least one individual whose credit history was so badly damaged by what [Parrilli] did that he had to get a new Social Security number and start all over,” says Edmond Chang, the assistant U.S. attorney prosecuting the case.

Next month, Parrilli is scheduled to appear in federal court for sentencing. He pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of credit cards with the intent to defraud, mail fraud and bank fraud and faces up to 45 years in prison and $750,000 in fines. Parrilli’s attorney, David Centracchio, didn’t return a phone call for comment.

But Demtschenko offered this limited praise for Parrilli’s technique, if not his work: “It was primarily identity theft that he did, and he was d**n good at it.”

http://illinoisissues.uis.edu/features/2...

Oh I'm so sorry he is a citizen, why would he commit ID fraud?

Because according to the Oct. 2007 report, "Identity Fraud Trends and Patterns Center" written by  Identity Management and Information Protection at Utica College.

The Offenders:

The data analysis showed more diversity among the age, race, gender, and

criminal backgrounds of offenders than the picture held by conventional wisdom.

• Most of the offenders – 42.5% -- were between 25 and 34 years of age at the time that the case was opened.

o The 35 – 49 age group made up 33% of the offenders.

o 18.5% were between 18 and 24 years old.

o The remaining 6% were 50 years old or older.

• 53.8% of the offenders were black; 38.3% were white.

• One third of the offenders were female.

o Of the females, almost two thirds were black.

• 24.1% of the offenders were born outside of the United States.

• 71% of the offenders had no arrest history.

o Of those who did, a third were for fraud, forgery, or identity theft or fraud.

• The most prevalent motive of the offenders was personal gain. It took

several forms including using fraudulently obtained personal identifying information to:

o Obtain and use credit

o Procure cash

o Conceal actual identity

o Apply for loans to purchase motor vehicles

Or look at pg . 31 to find

Gender, Race, Age, Place of Birth

Within the 517 cases included in this study, there were 933 defendants or offenders. As Figure 15 indicates, 67.4% (627) of the offenders were male.

Females accounted for a sizable minority of 32.6% (303).The gender of three of the offenders was not made available. Also included in Figure 15 is the distribution of age, race, and whether or not the defendant had an arrest history.

The age statistics are based on the age of the defendant during the year in which the case was opened. Information on the age of 116 offenders was not made available. The largest percentage of offenders – 42.5% -- were between 25 and

34 years of age (347). The 35 – 49 age group made up 33% of the offenders (270). 18.5% (151) were between 18 and 24 years old. The remaining 6% (49) were 50 years old or older.

The majority of the offenders were black: 53.8% (467). White offenders accounted for 38.3% (332). 4.8% (42) of the offenders were Hispanic and 3.1% (27) were Asian. The race for 65 of the offenders was not made available.

Information on arrest history was available for 922 of the defendants. Most of them – 71% (655) did not have any prior arrest history, while 29% (267) did.

http://www.utica.edu/academic/institutes...

Better life for who?