Adam and Eva had a navel?

Question

Who Knows!

Answer 1

Since neither existed in the form represented in religious mythology it's a moot point, but since Adam was made "in God's image" he would have a navel if God had one. Eve was made from a spare bit of Adam, and would have no need of a navel so technically she shouldn't have one.

Answer 2

No no no no no....They were a lot less cultivated way back then. None of this greenhouse technology.

They both had mandarins...

Answer 3

Probably not as they wouldn't have been attached to a placenta in a mothers womb.  But, can I ask Gemma T  why a woman needs a navel to give birth?!!!!.  Babies grow in a womb and come out of the v****a, the navel is not involved at all, it is simply the remnant of where the umbilical cord was.

Answer 4

i know this question... someone asked me before...

i'll just say, WHATEVER...

its not really an important facts anyway....

Answer 5

If you believe the Bible story, both Adam and Eve were created by God. They were not actually conceived in a womb, therefore would have had no umbilical cords. So, both would have had no navels.

Answer 6

More importantly, if the did were they innies or outies?

Answer 7

Exactly. I think that Adam and Eve might be a nice story all in all with a few moral lessons thrown in, but come ON. Who are they trying to kid? For one thing, this "what came first the chicken or the egg?" had nothing to do with a MAN being the world's first "mother". And stemming from just these two would be a line of pure incest, and therefore babbling idiots for offspring. And the pain of childbirth being so horrible because a SNAKE told Eve to eat an apple? This just shows that Adam sucked as a provider and she took sustanance elsewhere. That still happens everyday. But to blame the pain of a melon sized object passing through the tube of a drinking straw on that alone  is just idiotic.

  What would be a real breath of fresh air is if people would give themselves a smack in the forehead and realize that regardless of the actual circumstances surrounding our "beginnings," they were nonetheless well over 2000 YEARS AGO!!!

Think about how ignorant people were 100 yrs ago.

Think about the people who thought the world was round.

Think about what we know NOW.

How the h**l can we put any credit in anything conjured up, in a time when there was no tylenol for an extreme fever that could conjure up all kinds of hullucinations, or any colic medicine for babies to make them shut up so they used brandy, or told them how they would go to h**l and BURN if they didn't shut up! A desperate mother would say anything.

Sorry, I know it's all a fun story to think about, but there's so little solid fact on any of it, if at all, that it could all be just something that shows, more than anything else, our inability to accept change for what it is and throw out old ideas or traditions in favor of new ones that are clearly more realistic or logical.

And even tho I got a little carried away on this simple question, I believe this is the main human error that will also be the thing that causes our complete extinction.

Did they have a navel?

I don't think they ever existed, so no.

This is a chicken and the egg question, and it doesn't have much to do with Adam, I don't think.

Eve would know.

Answer 8

Hmmmmmmmmmm... must have done for eve to give birth technically.

Adam - maybe he was a freak!

Answer 9

They didn't exist...

Well maybe they did, but they had parents two...

Answer 10

no, since they were not conceived