After watching the Liverpool v Villa game?

Question

Was it a poor performance off Liverpool or a great 1 off Villa.

(proper analysis please)

Thanx

Answer 1

your just jealous

Answer 2

hi nick just got in was working today so never got to see it yet bet you the ref was against us lol

Answer 3

It was a huge improvement that saw Liverpool put in a performance that almost made them look like themselves. It was still below par, but an improvement none the less. We were never going to win it really with Rafa's horrible team selection. He seems to think Dirk Kuyt can pretend he's a winger and everything will be alright...every flippin game and everyone can see it aint gonna work. Same with Keane. His inability to use our two able wingers (Babel and Pennant) is beyond me and I think we have to start using our natural wingers sooner rather than later.

Overall, good performance by Villa, better performance from Liverpool...who were defensively solid and cancelled out Villa's usually vibrant strike force.

Answer 4

The so called best league in the world produced a game that would get football banned.   Liverpool without Gerrard are about dangerous as a lamb.

It was a poor performance from Liverpool (not 1 shot on target)

It was a poor performance from AV since they could beat such poor opposition.

Answer 5

A tactical genuis from MON. Villa played to their strength and constantly threatened Liverpool.

I agree with the answerer above. Liverpool was lucky to escape with a point.

Answer 6

Watching this, its either Chelsea, Arsenal or the 'Pool for the Premiership in my opinion.  Sir Alex has his mind on GB 2012 these days.

Answer 7

You do know Villa have won the Champions League before :)

Without Ronaldo you are nothing, Man Utd (well currently Tevez) is putting in all his effort in and it still doesn't help.

Liverpool are terrible, Torres-Keane partnership is USELESS!

Goals from an assist of Torres/Keane for Keane/Torres to score this season: 0

Who's Gerrard going to connect with???

Buying players all the time doesn't solve anything you know, normally it ruins the team chemistry

Answer 8

Liverpool have been riding their luck for their first three games and villa putin a goo perforance liverpool didn't have one shot target and still villa only had one pretty boring game o neil played a good tactical game.

Answer 9

Liverpool was lucky.

AV didnt attack much. seemed they were content with the point

Answer 10

Both teams defended well, and Liverpool created a lot of pressure, although sometimes Villa looked a lot like scoring. I would say that that game could on gone either way, but the attack of either team was horrid, especially Keane's couple of great chances. Neither made the most out of set pieces. I would say it was a very fair result, Liverpool didn't get a single shot on target and Villa only got the two. Villa will look at this as an improvement after concdeding 5 goals, and because it is a type of game they need a point from if they are going to puch for 5th. Liverpool will be happy with drawing away from home to a team that will msot liekly finish 5th or 6th. Let's face it, Manchester United and Chelsea will both find it dificult to get something at Villa Park. Good result for both teams, but I'm guessing from a neutral point of view it was a poor game. (Liverpool fan)

Answer 11

liverpool werent great again but hey ho top of the of league when youre not playing great isnt too bad

chelsea havent beaten villa at villa park for 8 years so theres no disgrace in drawing there

Answer 12

I've seen some good 0-0 draws that get 10 out of 10 for entertainment, this was worth about 2 out of 10 and the 2 goes to Villa for at least trying, Rafa seemed to settle for the draw with 20 mins to go; I would say he needs another striker as much as Man Utd do.