Agree With My Theory or Not?

Question

My Theory is: that Big Banking and Corporate Interests heavily funded Barack Obama's campaign against Hillary because they felt that, in November, Racism (and the fact Obama's name rhymes with Osama's) would defeat him and cause a Republican to win; continuing the Bush policy of little taxes on Corporations and Tax Cuts for the wealthy.

http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0009

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/url.cfm?ID=411693

First let me say I hope Barack Obama wins the election (Barr, McKinney and Nader will not) because a McCain Presidency will continue the 'Trickle-Down' Bush policies which has resulted in stagnant wages for most Americans, high inflation, climbing unemployment, rising poverty and record foreclosures.

Why would so many Investment Banks fund Barack Obama's campaign against Hillary Clinton?

Is it possible they wanted him to win because they believe Racism is so prevalent in the United States that Obama would have the best chance of losing to a Republican?

As the CEO of Viacom, Sumner Redstone- owner of CBS, said:

"From a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on. The Democrats are not bad people. . . . But from a Viacom standpoint, we believe the election of a Republican administration is better for our company."

I bring this up because I've encountered many Democrats, here in California, who say thre is "No way they would Vote for Obama." When I press them on why the ugly truth becomes obvious.

Answer 1

All Republicans should read your 2nd link, thanks for posting, hadn't seen that analysis.

I have been all over the place in theories during this election and am old enough to know that almost nothing that happens at this level is an accident, that most candidates are pre-ordained in some way.  How else can you explain 2004?  The list of bundlers you provided was somewhat revealing as to the types who support Obama and it isn't just the banks.  The banks have taken it in the shorts big time with Bush so it wouldn't make sense they would prefer a Republican.

The housing crisis, as well as inflation and unemployment are just beginning to be felt in the mainstream.  My guess is this would be in the Dems favor.  Maybe the banks see the writing on the wall and don't want to p**s Obama off.  I have no idea, honestly, I can't understand half of what my investment reports say.

Did a lot of research on Soros yesterday, as people keep posting references to his support of Democrats as something sinister and didn't find much about him I didn't like.

The demonization process that takes place during elections is so tiresome.  I think both parties count on this to a certain extent.  A truly educated and informed person would never vote Republican, but that's just IMO.  and so it goes.

Answer 2

Undoubtedly, your argument holds for some companies and some people.

As a Republican (fiscal conservative/social libertarian) I can only people vote their pocketbook and not their bias.  If they do, most Americans will vote Obama.

Answer 3

I live in California, And I do not know anyone in the area where I live, that's voting for obama!! We are a republican county, I have been here for 30 some years, worked in the rest. business, and know loads of people, I guess most are rep's. Well sometimes the ugly truth hurts!! I myself do not want an arab as my president!! and that's just what he is, and way too many ties to the mideast, that's what I hear from most people, And how about obama wanting billions for world poverty, Since when is the USA responsible for the poverty of the world!! I think its too early to talk about theories, We need to see what the repub's have planned, forget the media, they whoop it up way too much!!!

Answer 4

I agree Baracks taxes definately will sink us into recession

Answer 5

agree.

people are dumb enough to fall for the obama/osama so why not.

sad day in our country.

Answer 6

fbi are watching

Answer 7

You could be right.

I suspect he is another high aspiration, high rhetoric, expensively suited, smiling, confident...

Bliar!

I hope I am wrong but I sense nothing good ahead from him after the initial rhetoric.  Both candidates are subject to sway by big money interests... the entire system is corrupt to its very core and we the people count for absolutely nothing.

Answer 8

No... the type of people that you are talking about don't care about politics, they care about money and power... Obama would be easier to control (to get the kinds of legislation passed that they want.... which isn't the same as what a Conservative would want) What the powerful Globalist Corporations want is predictability and they can get that easier from the Left...

Answer 9

Well Richard, it is refreshing to know that I'm not the only person in the world who believes that very same thing! By all rights Hillary should have been nominated, but no, the powers that be had to stir up the pot real good with the only thing they had that could blind Joe Six pack, and give him a reason to suffer 4 or more likely 8 years more. That's right, Racism! There are still too many Bigots alive, and they will vote their hate! Why such stupid people, just can't see that people are just people! There are good and bad in ALL colors.Smart people won't hate a person, until he has been burned by that person! Bigots are just stupid, because they want to be. I saw this coming a while back, I fear with the Diebold voting machines, the race card, and all the other dirty tricks the NEOCONS pull, the Fleecing of America may go on for another term.