Al gore fans-- when will people that don't believe in global warming pull there heads out of their butts?

Question

this is not politics

Answer 1

Still no one is able to tell us if it will be warmer or colder any time in the future.

People only guess and these guesses are accepted as truth.

Globla warming is "Star Trek" science.

Answer 2

When you learn spelling and grammar.

Answer 3

I don't understand the anger towards Al Gore. How dare he say we should take better care of the environment!

I'm certainly not a radical when it comes to environmentalism, but the thought of conserving energy and recycling doesn't anger me as it obviously does some. This certainly is not a political issue. Many people just don't care what happens beyond their lifetime and they don't want to be hassled with it. It is unfortunate. To answer your question...never. Unless they are being hit straight on the head with it (think The Day After Tomorrow). The fact that they get so heated about the issue, proves it. I think they deny it so that they don't have to change their lifestyles, they get angry because they may worry that it could be true.

Answer 4

Probably never. Even when the world is crumbling around them, they will continue to disbelieve anything is changing, they will say 'its natural' and carry on polluting the atmosphere regardless. I don't think there's anything wrong with the way you posed your question. People who refuse to believe in global warming are people who can't be arsed to do anything about it. All the worlds climate scientists agree that global warming is happening, yet people cling to something they read in a tabloid or on some home-made website that states some 'evidence' that global warming isn't real.

Answer 5

35,000 SCIENTIST have signed there name saying there is No Global Warming.  United States Congressman said this on radio. I got reported on answers for saying this yesterday

Answer 6

Al Gore is a joke. News Flash you cronies, he's feeding you c**p!

Answer 7

When a conservative spokesman for global warming becomes just as popular as Gore, the right wing will not only embrace the realities of GW, but will claim leadership on addressing the issue. Until then it will just be nothing but weak attacks on Gore as a way to circumvent an actual discussion about the facts... the typical sort of Fox newsesque strategy that is dumbing down America.

Answer 8

...Sir, a piece of advice - if you ask your question in a kind, courteous manner, you usually will get heard.  Yours could use some improving.

...When will liberals research all viewpoints on global warming and come up with a logical solution,  and then proclaim the truth, and forget their liberal agenda?

...Pitching the truth and pushing your agenda to get your way is the worst kind of politics.

...Physician, heal thyself.

...P.S. Al Gore and his buddies should subject themselves to the same restrictions as they seek to put on others, too.

Answer 9

I agree that global warming will be the cause of the end of humans ( The Words , Global Warming). But not in the same way as Al thinks. We should all hope for a clean renewable energy sorce. But taxes on already $4.00 plus a gallon isn't going to solve the issue. It is only going to deplete our food source and the only ones that will be able to heat and eat will be the very rich, like Al. We small people will all die off and the Al Gores of the world won't have anyone to do the farming the processing and so on. The Al s of the world can't even pour p**s out of there boot without help. So yes global warming will be the end of us but not global warming itself. It is the fear of it. When enough people believe the sky is falling. It will.

Answer 10

Be sure to read the questions at the end!!

>

>  

>

>  

> -----

>  

>  

> Into the wild green yonder

>

>

> May 11, 2008

>

> By Walter E. Williams - Now that another Earth Day has come and gone,

> let's look at some environmentalists' predictions they would prefer we

> forget.

>

> At the first Earth Day celebration, in 1969, environmentalist Nigel

> Calder warned, "The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside

> nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for

> mankind." C.C. Wallen of the World Meteorological Organization said,

> "The cooling since 1940 has been large enough and

consistent enough

> that it will not soon be reversed."

>

> In 1968, Professor Paul Ehrlich, former Vice President Al Gore's hero

> and mentor, predicted a major food shortage in the U.S. and "in the

> 1970s... hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death."

> Mr. Ehrlich forecast 65 million Americans would die of starvation

> between 1980 and 1989, and by 1999 the U.S. population would have

> declined to 22.6 million. Mr. Ehrlich's predictions about England were

> gloomier: "If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England

> will not exist in the year 2000."

>

> In 1972, a report for the Club of Rome warned the world would run out

> of gold by 1981, mercury and silver by 1985, tin by 1987 and

> petroleum, copper, lead and natural gas by 1992.

>

> Gordon Taylor, in his 1970 book "The Doomsday Book," said

Americans

> were using 50 percent of the world's resources and "by 2000 they

> [Americans] will, if permitted, be using all of them."

>

> In 1975, the Environmental Fund took out full-page ads warning, "The

> World as we know it will likely be ruined by the year 2000."

>

> Harvard University biologist George Wald in 1970 warned, "civilization

> will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken

> against problems facing mankind." That was the same year Sen. Gaylord

> Nelson warned, in Look Magazine, that by 1995 "somewhere between 75

> and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct."

>

> It's not just latter-day doomsayers who have been wrong; doomsayers

> have always been wrong. In 1885, the U.S. Geological Survey announced

> there was "little or no chance" of oil being discovered in California,

>

and a few years later they said the same about Kansas and Texas. In

> 1939, the U.S. Interior Department said American oil supplies would

> last only another 13 years. In 1949, the interior secretary said the

> end of U.S. oil supplies was in sight.

>

> Having learned nothing from its earlier erroneous claims, in 1974 the

> U.S. Geological Survey advised us that the U.S. had only a 10-year

> supply of natural gas. In fact,, according to the American Gas

> Association, there's a 1,000- to 2,500-year supply.

>

> Here are my questions: In 1970, when environmentalists were making

> predictions of manmade global cooling and the threat of an ice age and

> millions of Americans starving to death, what kind of government

> policy should we have undertaken to prevent such a calamity?

>

> When Mr. Ehrlich predicted England would not exist in the

year 2000,

> what steps should the British Parliament have taken in 1970 to prevent

> such a dire outcome? In 1939, when the Interior Department warned we

> only had oil supplies for another 13 years, what actions should

> President Roosevelt have taken? Finally, what makes us think

> environmental alarmism is any more correct now the tune has been

> switched to manmade global warming?

>

> Here are a few facts: More than 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is

> the result of water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. Without the

> greenhouse effect, Earth's average temperature would be zero degrees

> Fahrenheit. Most climate change is due to the orbital eccentricities

> of Earth and variations in the sun's output. On top of that, natural

> wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all

> human sources combined.

>

> Walter

E. Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist and a

> professor of economics at George Mason University.

>

Answer 11

Going cranky, it doesn't matter what 35,000 scientists are saying, only the few scientists on board with Al Gore and his money-making machine is what counts. (btw, several of those "Incovenient Truth" scientists have backed out from Al Gore's claims.... maybe there just wasn't enough money in the world to keep up the charades).

Answer 12

When they catch on fire.

Answer 13

We should be skeptical about "scientists" who predict climate future based on computer models. People are trying to play God by saying, 'Oh, this computer model told me 50 years from now that this IS going to happen.' That's an arguable point. and I think we should question it. But to say that someone has absolute knowledge of the future seems to me to be playing something more than a mortal.

Answer 14

when the temperatures actually start to increase ill start believing in it

Answer 15

all they can do is speculat on what is going to happen no one knows when the world is going to end! but we should still be taking care of our enviournment. THE SKY IS NOT FALLING