All moon landings were fake or not?

Question

I do not like the nasa I say that tere a big univercel lie and do you think that they have fake the opetration to go to the moon just for the United stat as a better image of a them self and to think tere the best but tere big liars.

Answer 1

You're going to have trouble convincing anyone of your ridiculous beliefs with such poor spelling and grammar.  I mean, seriously, "tere"?  Could you be any lazier?  Wait, I don't want to know...

Answer 2

Um, I believe there was only one moon landing and no, it was not faked.

Answer 3

Sorry to disillusion you, but myself and 4,999 other representatives of the press from various countries were on hand to witness lunar landing  missions initiated by Apollo 11 on July 16, 1969 and ending with the Nixon administration termiating in 1974.  Apollo 11 's and subsequent landings were documented by the same technology which has afforded  improved medical care to third world countries as well and frankly, the world is a better place thanks to NASA and other days when US was not involved in rescuing  or supporting under-developed countries from intolerable conditions caused by less concerned and less humanitarian nations in dispute.  Namaste, asker, but please use your computer for more intelligent searches than your question seems to reflect.

Answer 4

First off, Inka Kola is a complete moron.

Second, the moon landing was real. Although normally I would go into detail on why it was real, and disprove all of your silly conspiracy theories, I have come to the conclusion that people who think it is fake are ignorant and don't listen, and based on your spelling and grammar, I would say you don't have a high enough IQ to understand any of the science behind it.

Answer 5

It was cheaper to go to the Moon than do a cover up.  Watergate was a conspiracy of only about 100 people.  There is no way that 30,000 people can keep a secret.  And if these 30,000 people weren't all in on it, then they have to somehow believe that their parts would have worked.  If their parts would have worked, why not do the launch?

Why haven't we returned?  It's expensive.  We've used our money for other expensive things - the Shuttle, the ISS, etc.

Answer 6

only a raving LOON would believe the Moon landings were faked, or perhaps someone with an axe to grind.

been seeing a lot of people with a poor grasp of English that fall into the latter category... perhaps the country they were from has a nascent space industry.

It must be hard for someone from India to have pride in a satellite launch that was done better 40 years ago by the USA.

Answer 7

not faked.

The Soviet Union (definitely not friends of the USA nor of NASA at the time) was able to listen to the TV broadcast on their own radio-telescopes when Neil took the "first small step for [a] man".  That is because the Moon was over the Pacific Ocean when it happened.

It just so happens that we can tell where a signal from space comes from (since 1931) and it just so happens that the Soviet Union was winning the space race up to that day.

If they had had any indication that it was faked, the cover-up by NASA and the US government would not even have lasted for the length of the TV broadcast.  The whole world would have known that very same day.

Instead, we have a handful of people trying very hard to convince others (without any proofs at all) that the Moon landings were fake.

Answer 8

evidence, please

if you are going to libel the greatest achievement of the 20th century, you need some evidence. do you have any? do you actually have a clue about the subject at hand?

Answer 9

your a joke, of course we landed on the moon. people who say we never landed on the moon have never produced any evidence. also if if english is your first language you should be ashamed.

Answer 10

I believe that it was faked.  Why haven't we been back since?  Our technology is much better nowadays, so what would be stopping us?

Answer 11

Where you come up with these stupid questions.  The landings were real.  Somehow, somewhere someone decided that just because what he saw "don't look right, man.  Ya know what I'm sayin' dude, ya know?"  There is a site which, I believe, is called "stupid science" and all the notions that are now floating around on the Internet can be dismissed.  Come on don't believe the c**p you read on the net.  You are much more intelligent than that.  Oh, by the way, use "check spelling."

Answer 12

It is not a lie. THINK ABOUT IT! Any evening look up to the full moon and ask yourself is it really THAT far away? Almost seems you could build a ladder long enough to reach it. If the space shuttle could go up so high and craft like Cassini and New Horizons can reach Sarturn and Pluto, Why can't 20th century technolgy like the Saturn 5 rocket reach the moon? It's just to well documented. Since most of us have never actually been there it's easy to say it was faked in a studio because we don't know any better...

Answer 13

If you want to go on believing that..then just go right ahead...no one can change your mind.

The real facts are that....ALL the moon landings were absolutely real and true....and did..in fact happen.

You're right about one thing...it was a matter of image....we were in a space race with russia...so we had to be first to land on the moon.

I don't know why you don't like NASA....they've done so many great things for our standards of living.

Many of the objects that you use today...are because of what NASA does.

Think about that.

Answer 14

Yes they did land on the moon, only people who

- hate the US or the US-Government

- know less science than a Highschool student

- want to make money with their books and videos

- simply are trolling

claim otherwise.

You seem to fall in the first two categories.

If you are interested in a real debate (which I seriously doubt, considering your stupid "question" that seemed more like a rant), may I recommend

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index....

Answer 15

The following information below... says that Apollo 11 was certainly faked, and that the other moon missions were genuine.

Note - this is from an ET source.  I believe the source to be accurate because I have looked into this material for the past 5 years.

I think the following site is a good place to start.

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_M...

(also www.figu.org [English Discussion Board])

NASA does appear to hide information from the public.  See the documentary "The Missing NASA Transmissions".

Also the Disclosure Project material, seems to confirm this.

Also see the site named 'the Living Moon'....

Answer 16

Well, as you cannot even spell much of anything correctly, it logically follows that you cannot offer anything more complex with any better odds of success. Take remedial english and, this time... pass it.

As for the daft and quite ignorant Inka cola, that our technology TODAY is better at SOME things doesn't in any way mean that we can do some things NOW that we used to be able to. We can't build a battleship anymore, the technologies to make such thick naval armour and huge naval guns is all long gone, because we stopped making such specifically complex things. The same with the vehicles used in Project Apollo. And, in many areas of basic rocket technology, we DON'T have better technology than we had on the Saturn V rocket. We don't have any operational rocket engines today that use liquid fuels and produce 1.5 million pounds of thrust. But, the first stage F-1 engines on the Saturn V did all that. The Space Shuttle main engines use exactly the same fuels that the Saturn V 2nd & 3rd stages used, oxygen & hydrogen. And, so on.

The point is that a rocket and spacecraft designed to carry a lot of material to low Earth orbit isn't the same spacecraft that is going to be able to carry anything farther out than that, just  as you cannot get 6 foot long Ikea bookshelves into your Corvette sports car.

Answer 17

The moon landings were in fact real. They did happen in a time period where the U.S. would be more inclined to fake it to look good, but they were in fact real and they even brought back rocks and stuff and it has been confirmed that this stuff us really from the moon. Why would you not like "the nasa"? Also you should probably learn to speak English or get an interpreter, or maybe you just can't spell and use punctuation correctly.You sound like Borat, or just a retarded person trying to type.

Answer 18

It was real. For one reason no one will belive you with all the spelling and grammer errors that you made. And another thing there was never any real evidnce that the moon landings were fake. The USSR would have know imeditly if it was fake and as it was durring to cold war if they could prove it was fake they would. as they did not do anything this means that we did land on the moon.