Question:

America ,and the 9-11.?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

ugghhhhh i'm so confused who was behind it!!! Everytime i get into this i just get more question in my head.

 Tags:

   Report

13 ANSWERS


  1. I say Ben Laden was behind it because he had political problems with Bush...

    Some people speculate it was the American government itself.. I don't know if that's true or not... You can watch videos on youtube about it.


  2. Al qaeda (terrorist organization for the uninformed) was behind it. Don't believe these ridiculous, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories that claim otherwise.

  3. The majority of the bombers were Saudi Arabian. The terrorist group that claimed it was Al-Qaeda, headed by Osama Bin Laden. (feel free to correct me if it wasn't Al-Qaeda.... don't say US)

  4. If you go around believing things like that, don't hate America...hate the ones responsible. Me personally, I'm still intrigued how people with BOX CUTTERS caused this type of catastrophe.

  5. And they call this the Information Age?

    The attacks were coordinated by al-Qaeda, a terrorist organization.

  6. Why are you confused?  Radical Arab terrorists were behind it.  Did you not see it broadcast on live television?

    There is a plethora of facts and evidence that proves this.   9-11 conspiracy theorists should be put into prison for lack of common sense.

    Get a life wackos.

  7. ASK THE QUESTON

    WHY did the worlds greatest military power FAIL to defend even its own HQ?

    Your tax dollars at work, a DEFENSE DEPARTMENT that fails to DEFEND!

    ya, right ... & I'm the easter bunny!

  8. Well the attacks were planned by Al-Qaeda within Afghanistan and it was a long process. The fact that it was a success for the most part was a surprising event because no one would have been able to predict it. The main reason is because of the United States position within the Middle East, for example take the US Cole, which was another event that was not predicted. Now we are being forced to protect against everything. If someone was to send a bomb to a building we would have systems in place where we would be able to counter-act to the event but now with the possibility of someone wearing a bomb is a little harder to plan for without suspecting everyone. There are also other theories which suspect the United States was behind it all along but most of those theories really stretch the truth or they just make c**p up. However it is always good to doubt what the government tells you but I don't think this government would be able to plan anything like that so well and still be able to cover it up and there is too much proof with al-Qaeda(SP) being the culprit. Make sure when you do research you go through reliable sources, just also note we really were not capable to record every event on tape or with some type of recording device because we really could not predict the events. At the time many of the main Intelligence services had a hard time talking to each other, The same is true right now but they are a little better at it. Its just hard to accept that a group of guys living in a cave was able to pull that off, you look at the logistics at it and you can barely imagine it. However there were allot of pieces put into play and it took a while to plan this out. There have been quite a few things we have been able to learn with how this type of group works and we are now able to counter-react to them. Now we just have to prepare our law enforcement on how to react to the unknown unknown. What you don't know you don't know. And the intelligence communities have been better on how to communicate with each other, 9-11 was a huge slap in the face and there have been allot of events that have been stopped since then.

  9. America's own government was behind it.  I'm just glad to be a Canadian :))

  10. Maybe Arab terrorists, but if so they did not act alone.  Suits in Washington and elsewhere were involved.

    If you seriously think that "error" was the cause for the government's failure to intercept the planes, then I have a bridge to China to sell you.  The evidence of government foreknowledge and cover-up is clear.  The question is, who are the criminals inside and above the government?  Those criminals have the influence and resources to control the government and the media.

    Shortly after 9-11 Secretary Rice claimed the government had "irrefutable proof" that Bin Laden was behind the attacks, and that "proof" would be made public "shortly". We are still waiting. The FBI is still waiting too. As it stands now, Bin Laden is not wanted for 9-11 because the FBI lacks the evidence.

    The 9-11 investigation was a cover-up. Research it. The hidden mandate was to arrive at conclusions supportive of the official fairy tale. The executive director charged with deciding what aspects to investigate was a Bush insider.  He made choices to exclude evidence contradicting the official fairy tale. Read the 9-11 Commission report preface. It  clearly stated that apportioning individual blame was not part of the mandate. Who is being protected by the government?  Why hasn't Congress used its power to investigate the insider trading?  That would provide some names of people with foreknowledge.  Who are they protecting, and why?

    A full and impartial investigation is in order, to consider all of the evidence and bring the non-Arab criminals to justice.

    I suggest you visit the web site of the "9-11 Scholars for Truth and Justice" and do some reading.  (That is a different site than "9-11 Scholars for Truth"--don't confuse the two).

    http://stj911.org

    and

    http://www.journalof911studies.com/

  11. Don't hate America!  Hate the US Politicians who conspired to attack our country.  Yes, it was an inside job.  But not all US Government officials are involved.  Most are intimidated and afraid of the ones who were involved.  And let's face it.. we have a fascist system.  Our government sold us out to big business long ago.  

    Our US Government doesn't work for the People anymore, but for the Rich Elitist Powers that be!  Google..David Rockefeller, the Rothschilds, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderburgers and you will see that it all fits into place.  When you finally understand what their agenda is... money and power.

  12. Al quaeda - the translation means 'the base', which is actually foreshortened from 'the database'.  

    This refers to a database of Taliban militants who were trained in terrorist tactics and armed by the USA via the Pakistani ISI (Inter Services Intelligence).  

    The original aim was to use them as a proxy terrorist force to fight the Soviets occupying Afghanistan ('our terrorists').

    So Al quaeda, 'the base', refers to what was certainly originally a CIA bought and paid for 'asset' - even the name says so because it refers to the CIA database of Mujahideen fighters.  Many official documents and comments support this - it is a well-known fact.  Try googling it or look on WIkipedia... this is no secret.  (In fact a lengthy article was published by the Sunday Times featuring an ex-SAS soldier who was unofficially asked to train the Mujahideen in terror tactics by the CIA.)

    Unfortunately lots of Americans are prone to manipulation - they just couldn't possibly believe their own government was complicit in this - they aren't even interested in asking why so many, such intelligent people, such experienced people would believe such a thing... ex-military and ex-security people included.  

    It just could be that those people did more research, knew far more about the CIA and it's historic role, knew more about terrorism and had a better grasp of logic to be able to deduct that there were such major gaps in the government story that it couldn't possibly be true.

    How many of them know that 7/7 (London) also had a counter terror exercise on the same day as their attacks, run by a certain Mr Peter Powell, who worked for a group connected to a Mr Guiliani of all people?  And that this scenario involved not only exactly the same times as the (coincidental, we are lead to believe) terrorist attacks, but exactly the same locations!!

    How many people picked up on the fact that a Mr Natanyahu was in London and had forewarning of a 'terrorist' attack that day... so someone knew beforehand!

    Of course Blair and his government said 'no inquiry' - why?  In the old days important events meant an inquiry was essential, but apparently now only unimportant events merit an inquiry so that seemingly unimportant lessons can be learned!

    What about the changing timeline of the event - I'm talking about the official version of the events here?

    What about the US mainstream media reports from serving (and clearly angry / upset) FBI officials claiming that the leader of ths group was nearly arrested on several occasions... but that demands came from MI6 in London to let him go... even a few weeks before this event!?

    So if the leader of the group WAS the leader of the group, how come he was supposed to be working for MI6... ?

    In which case what did they know beforehand... ?

    Have you seen the 'official video footage' (a freeze frame only)... taken in rush hour - how come in the London RUSH HOUR there are only the 'terrorists' present!?  

    Another piece of video is an obious fake... why?  

    How come eyewitnesses said that the floor of the carriages was blown upwards?  What would the laws of physics dictate if a bomb was placed on the floor... instead of underneath it?

    How come over a year later the Metropolitan Police said they couldn't identify the explosives used?  (Come on, this is getting laughable isn't it!)

    ... the fact is that a TRUE story would simply be CONSISTENT with the facts... and the official story isn't - so we are NOT being told the truth.  Do you remember that on the same day Blair was supposed to be announcing the withdrawal of UK troops from Iraq, under huge domestic pressure at home and massive unpopularity... I do!

    Actually it IS really that simple.  Follow the FACTS and not the stories and you will come to your own conclusion.

  13. Depends on how far back you are willing to go.

    1. Plane hijackers were responsible!

    [[Plane hijackers were Al-Qaieda terrorists...]]

    2. Al-Qaieda terrorists were behind it!

    [[Al-Qaieda was trained and supplied by the US in the 1980s to fight the Soviets...]]

    3. The US was behind it!

    (But most people like to stop at the second conclusion; ignorance is bliss)

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 13 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.