Any british royalties that aren't fugly ?

Question

I know it started out as a way to keep the 'royal' traits in the royal family blah blah but they all aren't sights to behold. Do what Charles did and improve the inbred gene pool, they don't have to marry the 'peasants' and go through all the hoopla like in Diana's case. Just sleep around and insert select babies into the midst.

Now this is what a Royalty should be: http://tinyurl.com/3bu4kn

Peace

Answer 1

Hmm Diana's sons are very very handsome.

Answer 2

Zara -  the Princess Royal's daughter

Other beautiful lesser British royals:

Lady Gabriella Windsor - daughter of Prince Michael of Kent

Lady Helen Taylor - daughter of Prince Edward, Duke of Kent

Answer 3

I know 3

Princess Beatrice of York: She's quite pretty in my opinion the prettiest in the royal family even though she suffers from mild dyslexia

Princess Eugenie of York: She is not as pretty as her older sister (Princess Beatrice) and she is currently 6th in line for the throne.

Princess/Lady Louise of wessex: She's so cute she was only born in 2004 and her leagal name is Princess Louise but as she was born to an Earl and Countess she was given the name Lady Louise.

Answer 4

Diana started to improve the gene pool in the UK, her sons are great looking.  Hopefully they will improve the gene pool further by marrying nice looking women (Kate Middleton is one).  Just be grateful that Prince Charles and Camilla didn't breed.

Answer 5

The Queen's oldest grandaughter Zara is very pretty.

Answer 6

Yes they haven't anyone as lovely as Queen Rania - but few countries have!

Here's Zara though, Princess Anne's daughter http://www.supanet.com/entertainment/ent...

You know who I thought was lovely was Queen Alexandra. (That was a long time ago though-- she was the Danish princess who married Edward VII.  She was very pretty as a young woman - - - and it was like uncanny how youthful she still appeared when she was old.)