Anybody got any links to a serious debate between those who think 911 was an inside job and those that don't

Question

I would prefer to believe it wasn't, but haven't seen any good explanations about various things, like the collapse of the towers. I've read the popular mechanics article, but it seems to have a few basic false premises, like the structure of the buildings

Answer 1

This will convince you

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

We cant have a serious debate on whether it was an inside job, because the govt hasnt had an honest investigation, and they destroyed alot of the forensic evidence

Answer 2

Use your own common sense dude.  I went through all of the various conspiracy theories, and they all contain major flaws in logic and critical thinking.

Not one of them ties anything cohesive together, it's just a bunch of make-believe ideas that people are throwing out which don't tie together.

The government could have simply bombed the Pentagon to p**s of America.  They could have simply crashed ONE PLANE into the ground, and we'd be ready for war.  They could have burned Disneyland to the ground, and moms all over the country would be ready to fight the enemy.  But no, conspiracy nutjobs want you to believe that they pulled off this incredibly complex conspiracy, yet were stupid enough to have it filmed?  Wouldn't they have bombed the news stations first?  My words really can't express how silly the whole conspiracy really is.

While I don't like the Bush Administration, that doesn't mean they murdered their own people in some hare-brained plot that would take HUNDREDS of PATRIOTIC AMERICANS to concoct and employ.  Who on earth would volunteer for this?

The so-called "proof" movies do nothing but shock people with visuals and make up blatant lies.  The part comparing a C130 to a 727? is the worst.  Look at the spec sheets of both planes, do an elementary physics equation, and you'll see that the 727 can be much more destructive as a weapon than a C130.

The idea that the passengers of the planes were "bought off" is disgraceful...completely disgraceful.

The part about the first-responders in the towers reporting bomb explosions?  Yeah, no s-h-i-t...what would you think if you were there?  I personally thought the next plane was gonna hit my house...nobody knew what was happening, and to use transcripts from that moment is intentionally misleading.

The images of a hole in the Pentagon with no plane debris is doctored, because I searched and found the real photo which shows the wheels and landing gear assembly.  The problem is that you can't find this stuff quickly, because hundreds of people are trying to cash in on the conspiracy, and they blanket the search engines with conspiracy websites.  What does that mean?  That means when you type in 9/11 photos, all you get are conspiracy sites.   It takes some serious digging to find the actual photos, actual interviews with people, actual transcripts, etc.

But wait, maybe I'M IN on the conspiracy too!!

If these movie makers are willing to suspend those facts to further their goofy ideas, then what other things are they simply making up?  Movies aren't science, don't be duped by shocking videos + narration.  That's called propaganda, and you are being fooled.

The real conspiracy here is that the people who own these sites are making A LOT of money off gullible, uneducated people who bring them web traffic and donations.

Oh yeah, and if there were no hijackers:  THEN WHY AREN'T  PEOPLE PROTESTING TO GET ZACH MOUSSAOUI RELEASED FROM JAIL??  Obviously he couldn't have been the 20th hijacker, so release this innocent man!!

*727  I can't recall if it was a 727 or a variant, but at the time of my research, I knew, and compared the correct two planes.  I don't really care to look into it any longer, since it just gives more money to the "real conspirators" who own the websites.