Anyone else despise Undertaker?

Question

Why does he always have to win? Every single d**n match. And even if the man loses, it has to be due to inference. Heaven forbid a match occurs where he doesn't look strong, right? No, Undertaker must always look strong in a match. :

Is there a written constitution that exists backstage in WWE that states "Undertaker....must always win or lose via interference".

Is he the most selfish wrestler in history? I think so. He's worse than HBK (1990's), Hogan, Nash (WCW days), and HHH....combined!!

Undertaker debuted in 1991. His first clean loss happened in 1998 to Stone Cold. 7 d**n years without a clean loss.

Why? Has any other wrestler been given that privilege? No...why him?

We can easily see that he jobbed to Khali because he knew Khali wouldn't go far. He lost to Batista, but only after he beat Batista like 800 times before. I'll give him credit for Stone Cold and Lesnar. But that's only 2!!

Why is it he never jobbed to Rock? Why is it he couldn't job to Edge? Why is it he couldn't lose to Randy Orton? Why is it he never jobbed to Kane?

Stupid Taker not wanting to lose

Answer 1

He's had more clean loses than that. Mabel at King of the Ring 1995. Mankind at King of the Ring 1996. Plus more on Raw and Smackdown in the past.

Also who said it's Undertaker's choice ? Undertaker has jobbed to Kane. Kane beat Undertaker clean in a one on one match in 1998 on Raw. Also Undertaker lost more than one match during his American Badass gimmick.

Taker doesn't have to job to make opponents look good. Batista's work (and stock) improved greatly after his feud with Undertaker. people took notice of Festus after a strong showing against him in a SD match.

you're acting like he abuses his power constantly. If he did that then why have I never ever seen anything bad said about him by any of the guys backstage ?

Undertaker hardly ever losing is because of his gimmick and that's a fact. His gimmick isn't meant to be on that's constantly jobbed out. Again who said it's Undertaker's choice ? Just because he's been in the company since November 1990 doesn't mean that he calls all the shots. There is a person named Vince McMahon you know ? Undertaker is a humble man and I can tell that from his interviews and what other people who are wrestlers, say about him.

You must understand that just because someone like him has been in the company for seventeen and half years doesn't mean that he books for himself. Undertaker losing for the most part by interference is because if you notice during those interference loses his opponents are always heels and thats a way of putting his heel opponent over as a heel. If you also notice Undertaker has been screwed the most times kayfabe/storyline wise.

Answer 2

I understand your anger toward taker. I do not agree with all your statements but I can understand why you believe them to be true.

Takers notable loses

ultimate warrior

randy savage

hulk hogan

yokozuna

bret hart

mankind

vader

hbk

kane

austin

kurt angle

maven

the rock {in a triple threat match}

lesner

jbl

khali

kennedy

edge {money in the bank}

Answer 3

Undertaker is probably one of the biggest wrestlers to ever push younger talent. He has been beaten MANY times by other wrestlers, not just by DQ. He's pushed Randy Orton, Edge, Batista, Kane, and many many others. The man is very unselfish, hard working, and in my opinion one of if not the greatest WWE wrestler of all time. Backstage he's looked at as a leader. If you wanna see a ego maniac a s s hole, look no farther then Hulk Hogan. This was a dumb question, just an idiot ranting about something he knows nothing about. Do your wrestling research better before you come on here and make yourself sound like a complete moron.

Answer 4

Undertaker is the best. Your the one who sucks. He is the man. What have you done with your life ? Get off the couch and get a real life buddy. The Undertaker has done more in life than you ever will. He will be better than you will ever be. I bet you just sit there on the computer all day and do nothing, right ?

Answer 5

You just want someone to tell you you're wrong. I'm not gonna do that because I think you already know.

Just in case you don't though, The Rock beat Taker cleanly on Monday Night Raw a few weeks before the 1998 Survivor Series. I remember this because the week after, The Rock beat Kane cleanly on Raw. Did you see Wrestlemania 24? Edge kicked out of every chokeslam, tombstone, last ride, and managed to reverse the Undertaker every time he tried Old School. Edge had Taker's number until Taker put on the Deadman's Choke.

Answer 6

yeah he sucks he killed edge a hardcore legend and wwe/wwf legend

Answer 7

THANK you so much!!I thought i was the onlt one in the fickin world who hated undertaker.He selfish and washed up and needs to retire  

Starred

Answer 8

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind... he rocks ps anwer http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...

Answer 9

A lot has to do with his Gimmick, He kinda suppose to be dead and not feel pain but his gimmick actually has become more human since he first arrived in the wwe.  I don't know if you notice but when a few wrestler past away these last few year almost all wwe superstar paid tribute on tv or show up  except for him and not because  he does not want to but it goes against his gimmick to feel compassion or cry so to answer your question  he is not suppose to lose and secondly since he is a face or a good guy usually the good guy lose by interference or something like that if they goes against heel.

Answer 10

It seems you're alone on this one buddy, UT is one of the most respected WWE Superstars ever, I don't know where you get your info, but UT have lots of clean wins and loses, it sounds like you started watching wrestling yesterday or something.

Answer 11

Whatever dude!!! he still has more clean losses than so called legends such as Hulk Hogan, Kevin Nash, Goldberg, Steve Austin....and the list goes on

Answer 12

u r a jerk off

i could pick u apart piece by piece but every1 knows that u r full of it,

1 thing thats real stupid tho is him jobbing 2 khali coz he knew he wouldnt go far? u have 2 be kidding me, he jobbed 2 khali coz he was told 2, at the time wwe was trying 2 hook the indian audience so theres your reason y he jobbed 2 him, everything u said there is your oppinion, but keep it 2 yourself

Answer 13

Undertaker (to steal one of Triple H's catchphrases) is that d**n good. He never got to the top of the game by making mistakes. His technical ability is unquestioned. He never got to be where he is buy stringing his career along through burying his opponents. He actually wins clean. There is nothing about the Undertaker that makes me believe that his ego is as large as the locker room. If he knows that he's that good, why not benefit from it? In fact, I'd like to see the Undertaker inducted into the hall of fame while he's still a main-eventer.

Answer 14

woa man he has nothing to prove  obviasly

he is the best next to hbk that is

but cena always wins the d**n matches im glad he lost at the ppv but still u gotta respect the undertaker

hes just that d**n good:)

Answer 15

Why was John Cena pushed to the top of the moon for no good reason all of a sudden? Undertaker has carved much more of a legacy than Cena has but Cena wins the WWE title pretty much at least once a year