Anyone else here this tape of Gov. Palin?

Question

She laughs as an opponent who fought cancer, is called a ***** and a cancer.

What does this say about her character as a woman and a human being?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKkydrUnBZE

Answer 1

Sorry, but you can have cancer and still be a b*tch

If you really want to pretend like you know something about this, rather than just saw a youtube video, you should mention that Lyda Green has slammed Sarah Palin at EVERY turn...There is no love lost between those two...People have rivals, it's normal

And for the record...Lyda Green IS a b*tch.

Look up some of the things she has said about Sarah Palin:

http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/5...

Answer 2

she laughed because it was funny radio banter.  ever listen to morning radio?  that is lame compared to what i typically hear.  the woman in question is in fact a first class *****.  cancer or not.

Answer 3

No, I hadn't heard it before. I'm not sure that this says anything in particular about her character. It sounds like nervous laughter -- maybe she was made uncomfortable by what was said rather than enjoying it. If so, if she can't deal with a radio talk show host in Alaska, what does that say about her readiness to step up to the national/world stage? If she's the VP, will she be kept out of the public eye for her entire term? Will she actually be the Vice President in anything other than name?

Answer 4

Awful woman.

And her voice is just as bad. Four years of ear bleeding if team McPain wins.

Answer 5

It's obvious that she hates sick people, isn't it?

Agh, what a terrible pick for VP...the Republicans are very desperate.

Answer 6

No, but have you seen this article written by The Catholic Church on Obama?

Deal Hudson: Obama and Infanticide?

By Deal W. Hudson

7/2/2008

Inside Catholic (www.insidecatholic.com)

The Roman Catholics for Obama Web site has no mention of his opposition to the Born Alive Infant's Protection Act.

Advertisement

WASHINGTON, DC (Inside Catholic) - Infanticide is becoming a touchy subject for Barack Obama.

So much so that his supporters either deny that their candidate ever voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or they describe his votes as "procedural," as if Obama never really opposed providing medical treatment for infants who survived an abortion.

The facts show otherwise.

The Born Alive Infant Protection Act was first introduced in the Illinois legislature in 2001 after nurse Jill Stanek revealed that babies born alive in Christ Hospital in botched abortion procedures were left to die, unattended by medical personnel.

That same year Stanek testified before the Judiciary Committee, where Obama asked whether the bill would subvert a woman's right to abortion. Obama voted against the bill in committee but "present" on the Senate floor.

When the bill was reintroduced in 2002, Obama again voted against it in committee and was the only state senator to speak against it on the Senate floor. Again the bill was defeated with Obama voting "no" and leading the opposition.

Here is what he said:

"Whenever we define a pre-viable fetus as a person that is protected by the Equal Protection Clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a 9-month old -- child that was delivered to term.

That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it -- it would essentially bar abortions, because the Equal Protection Clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an anti-abortion statute."

2002 was the year the U. S. Congress passed and President Bush signed the federal version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. Unlike Obama in Illinois, Sen. Hillary Clinton voted to support the bill. In fact, the bill passed the Senate 98 to 0 with pro-abortion senators like Boxer (D-CA) and Reid (D-NV) supporting it.

In 2003, the bill was introduced in the Illinois legislature for the third time and directed to a committee chaired by Obama, Health and Human Services. They refused to bring the bill to a vote.

Only when Obama left for Washington in 2005 did the Born Alive Infant Protection Act pass the Illinois legislature. It's for good reason Barack Obama has been called "the most pro-abortion presidential candidate ever."

The Roman Catholics for Obama Web site has no mention of his opposition to the Born Alive Infant's Protection Act. Look under its section "Life and Dignity of the Human Person," and you will find statements on the death penalty, the Iraq War, gun control, and the promise to nurture "a socio-economic environment" that will provide "a safety net that will make abortion increasingly unnecessary and rare."

Some of Obama's infanticide apologists argue that since the declared intention of Obama in voting against the BAIP Act was to uphold Roe v. Wade then it was not evidence of "support for infanticide." Such poor logic completely detaches Obama's act of voting against the bill from its consequences. Without the passage of the bill, infants born in Illinois remained vulnerable to the lack of treatment witnessed first-hand in Christ Hospital by Jill Stanek.

It would be like a senator arguing that his vote to approve Iraq War funding was just to "support the troops" but not the war. How can you put a gun in a soldier's hand without taking responsibility for what happens when he shoots it?

Democratic pundits don't want to talk about Obama on abortion or infanticide, either. On a recent CNN broadcast, Wolf Blitzer asked Bill Bennett what he would ask Obama, if given the chance.

Bennett said he would ask Obama about his abortion extremism and why he "doesn't see a problem with killing a baby after it's been born after eight months."

Donna Brazile, well-known Democratic consultant, reacted strongly: "You want to have a conversation about narrow issues, but the American people want to talk about gas prices."

Brazile can be sure that$4.oo per gallon gasoline isn't going to divest the millions of religious conservatives who care about the dignity of human life of their repugnance for infanticide. The last thing the Democrats want to hear are questions raised about Obama's "moral judgment," as Bill Bennett did on CNN.

Obama's attempt to move to the middle of the political spectrum will have to overcome two major obstacles: the memory of Rev. Wright at the National Press Club and Obama's

Answer 7

did you read the article that goes along with it?

http://www.adn.com/opinion/comment/st...

that's not all.....

she kinda seems b***hy herself no?

Answer 8

No I don't here it.

Answer 9

Grasping desperately arent we?...lol

Mcain/Palin  08 !

Answer 10

Nice...sounds like me laughing when I found out that her daughter got knocked~up!!!    

Answer 11

Wow... my guess is that the republicans listening won't even know how casually evil this c**p is.

Casually evil is the republican way.

Answer 12

She's being human and I suspect most candidates have moments like this. The good ones have handlers that make sure their candidate aren't being tape or recorded when they have these moments...

Answer 13

Wow. What a monster.

That says a lot about her.

Answer 14

That would be hear not here.

Answer 15

Sounds like she has the same sense of humor as McCain, a real class act! NOT!!

Answer 16

Oh, no. That's just awful.