Anyone watch a documentry that says global warming is fake?

Question

yeah i watched a couple and actually converted, but has anyone actually watched it and not converted and thought it was a load of crappolla? if you havent you should watch one before answering here

Answer 1

Sure.  The ridiculous swindle video.

"A Channel 4 documentary claimed that climate change was a conspiratorial lie. But an analysis of the evidence it used shows the film was riddled with distortions and errors."

http://news.independent.co.uk/environmen...

"Pure Propaganda"

http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313p...

Explanations of why the science is wrong.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/arc...

History of the director.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Durk...

Gore's movie may be a little over dramatic, but it has the basic science right.  This movie does not.

Channel 4 itself undercuts the movie in a funny way.  If you go to their website on the movie you find links to real global warming information.  They also have a way to "Ask the Expert" about global warming.  The questions go to a respected mainstream scientist who supports (mostly) human responsibility for global warming.

So, why did Channel 4 broadcast it?

"The science might be bunkum, the research discredited. But all that counts for Channel 4 is generating controversy."  

http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climat...

Answer 2

nice to know someone else doesn't believe it!!

heres some facts

1) The polar bear population has gone from 5000 to 25000 in 10 years. glaciers are melting others are forming. And polar bears can swim!



2) If you took every car off every road in the US the temperature would change less than a TENTH OF A DEGREE!

3) People cause 3.5% of temperature change with .4% coming from cars.

4) When ice melts, the water level drops. We will not drown. If you don't believe me, put water and a bunch of ice (you need alot of ice to see the difference) in a bowl and mark the water level. let the ice melt or microwave it and the water level will have dropped.

5) 5 billion dollars a year is wated by the US government to research "climate change"

6) no one has proved why the hole in the ozone layer appeared, so the theory that the extreme cold caused it is just as credible as the theory thet cfcs or whatever caused it.

7) Al Gore shows his audience a slide of CO2 concentrations, and a slide of historical temperatures. But for very good reason he does not combine them in one overlaid slide: Historically, atmospheric CO2, as often as not, increases after warming. This is typical in the campaign of claiming “consensus” to avoid debate (consensus about what being left unspoken or distorted).

less than 20 years ago they were freaking out about the next ice age!!!!

what more wil it take to convince everyone? why believe what politicians and liberal "scientists" say when you can just look at the science and prove it wrong!?

Answer 3

Here are some good ones available:

Unstoppable Soalr Cycles

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF_2bP9n3...

The Truth About Climate Change: http://tinyurl.com/3xeokp

Scientists Ignored: http://tinyurl.com/366dbf

An Inconvenient Truth or Convenient Fiction? Part II: http://tinyurl.com/63cfq2