Seems like China's getting a lot of golds in obscure events. If you take out diving and gymnastics, which I'm willing to admit China fields a strong team for, then you get stuff like:
archery
badminton (3)
judo (3)
shooting (5)
table tennis (2 freebie golds basically since who else plays Olympic ping pong?)
weightlifting (8 golds....seriously, they're being tested for doping, right?)
If you look at US's non-gymnastics, non-swimming golds, they include:
cycling
tennis
track and field
sports that are a lot more competitive and "high profile", so to say.
The same holds for comparing silver and bronze, the Chinese medals seem to be mostly in events where any country with a big sports program that decided to really focus on it could beat out the lesser countries that usually medalled, just on strength of training and quality of facilities and equipment over 4 years.
If the Olympics were pared down so there wasnt such a bias towards certain sports that have several very similar events and/or categories to cherry pick, would China still be so far ahead?
Tags: