When Energy saving Light bulbs first were around, I was taught that in energy Consumption terms they were a bit like a Flourescent Strip light bulb. In that, when you switch them on they use lots of energy initially, and then only a faint trickle of electricity once they were fully warmed up. And warming up and initial Trickle energy consumption would be approximately equal to 20 minutes of energy of a traditional filament light bulb, and so you only used energy saving light bulbs, where they were likely to be on for a long time.
So, if for example you use an energy saving light bulb in your 'under the stairs cupboard' (or other such place) and go in and switch the light on and 30 seconds later switch it off again - it is actually less ecological than having a fillament light bulb in place.
IS this true today with advances in technology since the first energy saving light bulbs came out?
IS it therefore wrong for the UK Governemnt to say that no one can have fillament lights
Tags: