Question:

Are feminists more likely to be sadistic???!?!!!!?!?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

why/why not?

 Tags:

   Report

15 ANSWERS


  1. No.  Because it's misogynist nonsense.


  2. Certainly not!  Only the most literate people are able to admire and emulate de Sade.   Almost needless to say, feminists are culturally illiterate, functionally semiliterate--as demonstrated constantly on this site.  The Marquis' rigorous principles are way beyond their capabilities.

  3. No. There is no correlation.

  4. Apparently men are more likely to be sadistic and women (including feminists) are more likely to be masochistic.  

    To me, a more interesting question is what causes these sexual paraphilias.  There seems to be an aspect of experience of victimization, but it looks as though social power dynamics are also a factor.

  5. Yes. most feminists are women.... Women are evil beats who delight in the suffering of whoever they trap into a relationship.

  6. Yes most all feminist are sadistic.

  7. No, because don't you need compassion and empathy to understand the issues that feminism focuses on?

    A s****t doesn't care about other humans or their feelings, or their advancement. It's all about seeing other people suffer.

    No, I don't think feminism is out to make men suffer.

  8. No. Sadism just means you're mad or creepy. Feminist isn't an extremely specified group like g*y people, black people, or people who are missing a leg, it just mean you're a person who thinks men and women are equal. Men can be feminists too, and it doesn't mean they are g*y!

         I suppose "manly women" are more sadistic than normal women, and I guess "manly women" are feminists, so that could be where your idea comes from.

  9. Yes. I'd think so.

    Sadism is eroticized anger.

  10. This is at once a fallacious question and a good question.

    It's fallacious because it attempts a causal link between two disparate things which, in themselves, have nothing to do with each other.

    But it's a good question because I must dialectically counter with the questions: What do you mean by "feminist?" (How are you defining it?) And, do you mean "Sadistic" in the sexual sense or in the psychological disorder sense?

    If you mean Sadistic in the sexual sense then, yes, - let's say certain feminists, would be more than open to Sadism/Sado-Masocism (more specifically BDSM). One example is the great Camille Paglia (but of course she is the "anti-feminist" feminist). This is a legitimate and healthy expression of human sexuality.

    If you mean Sadistic in the "sociopathic" sense then you are just tangling yourself deeper into fallacy and are probably a phallocentric patriarchal chauvinist.

  11. The proof is in the pudding.....

    The domestive violence rate among feminits and lesbians is much higher than the traditional marriage.

    I've seen it.  

    Everything that women have tried to avoid.....They've become.

    Only worse.

  12. I think it depends on what kind of feminist.  Many here claim to only want equality.  However there are some militant ones who don't care if a man is innocent; we are all guilty because of our genitalia.

    For them they have their own Final Solution.  And it doesn't include empathy for men or boys.

  13. Strange you should ask this.

    Some researchers have found a definite link between feminism and a condition known as sado-narcissism.

  14. No! And what led you to ask such a question?

  15. NO?!?!?!??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    What would be the point???????????????????????????????????...

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 15 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.