I submitted a question earlier, "Are landlords by law required to address noise issues?" and received an interesting interpretation of "quiet enjoyment". If you're interested go to my earlier question.
A standard tenancy agreement here in Canada seems to address the matter of “quiet enjoyment†differently and it comes under the “Conduct†clause of the agreement. In part this is what it says: I can't speak for all of Canada but certainly this applies to some parts:
"...the tenant or tenant's guest shall not cause or allow loud conversation, music, tv, radio or irritating noise to disturb the -peaceful enjoyment- of other occupants at any time, and in particular between the hours of 10:00pm and 9:00am. The landlord may end the tenancy pursuant to the Act as one of its remedies."
Are there not similar stipulations on a U.S. rental agreement or does it vary that much from state to state?
While I know one can always try to complain to the police it seems to me that the tenant should expect the landlord to enforce the terms of the rental agreement or not include such wording in the agreement.
I don't want landlords who happen to read this to go on the defensive. You are not under attack. I just get frustrated when I read comments like, "if you don't like it then just move" ( not to myself but to others who are having problems). Of course a person is going to move if it becomes intolerable. But that should only be a last resort. Thoughts everyone?
Tags: