Are rh-negative blooded people all "white" or are we stuck on theoritical ancestry not present?

Question

I think, all Rh-negative blooded people like me are "white" besides the theory of rh-negative blood all around that still does not define our true ancestry. The most talked about theory of the rh-negative blood lineage were possibly from way back during the nephilim days of Enoch and Noah some more than 4200 years ago. Today, most of us rh-negatives boast our ancestry to the "celtic" region. The book of Enoch tells that Noah was a blonde, possibly have inherited the recessive hair gene from another lineage, possibly the nephilim lineage of possible angel-hybrid. Anyways, the bottomline is, we as Rh-negative blooded people still does not have our real ancestry figured out and if it is so the angels, etc..so be it. However, I think, we're all whites or a white factor. I'm not trying to be racist but are trying to judge our ancestry.

Anyways, I will leave it at that for all of you to answer or ponder...Thanks for reading! [Joshua Beverly Hills-CA-USA]

Answer 1

Considering nothing was known about blood 4200 years ago turns your post into a rant.

Answer 2

I understand that all mankind originated in Africa.  Therefore, we were all originally African.  Africa has been called the cradle of humanity.

Answer 3

Uh, I believe the term for your Biblical Rh rant is "hoo-hah."

The group with the highest percentage of Rh negative individuals isn't Caucasians of any origin, including blonds and/or Celts, but European Basques, 35% of whom are Rh-neg. Caucasians, 16%. American Blacks, 7%.

Kindly get a leg to stand on.

Answer 4

I don't know,I also don't know what this question has to do with the Royalty section.You may have more luck in the "insignificant blood type and platelet category"Good luck in your quest.

Answer 5

You really need to concentrate on something other than yourself. Perhaps getting out of Beverly Hills would help! Best of luck----