Are some folk just plain dumb or do they genuinely not understand Kate's answer??

Question

She didn't answer the 48 answers as she knew she was being set up.

The Q she did answer :

Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?

A. 'Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.'

She makes perfect sense. What sane person would intentionally support an investigation going the wrong way??

Apart from the miscarriage of justice against herself, she knew that the investigating authorities were wasting precious time barking up the wrong tree, when they should have been searching desperately for her Madeleine.

Can it be that people have lost their objectivity in the cloud of hate that comes from a witch hunt???

Answer 1

Some of the users on here, who purport to be intelligent, seem to be so hate-filled that their sense of reason and logic has been lost, along with their ability to think objectively.

Answer 2

They've also asked her unlawful questions like the one were they've invited her to comment on the evidence of sniffer dogs and DNA testing on samples taken from the McCanns' holiday apartment and hire car implicating Maddie's death and Kates involvement. If it was me and i was innocent i would not have been polite enough not to answer.

Answer 3

What a cruel callous cold calculating mother she is. How any mother can deny police the information they need to help investigate the disappearance of her daughter, the daughter she herself cruelly callously coldly and calculatedly left defenseless home alone in an unlocked apartment in a foreign country night after night just beggars belief.

||edit|| Faith when a child goes missing 9 times out of 10 it is due to someone known to the child. The police in investigating all avenues have at some point to question and rule out the parents from any wrong-doing. Now pray tell me why the McCanns should be any different to every other police investigation into child 'abductions'?

Answer 4

If I was questioning someone in a legal capacity, and that someone refused to answer my questions or refused to co-operate, I would immediately wonder what that person was hiding.  I would be even more suspicious of them and would redouble my efforts to find out what they were hiding.  Wasting even more and more "precious time".

I certainly wouldn't think "Oh well, they must be innocent so I will immediately go and search for other suspects".

So I guess I must be one of the 'dumb' ones, because to me, she makes absolutely NO sense.  Only an insane person would refuse to co-operate and deliberately go out of their way to obstruct, provoke and antagonise the very people trying to help find their child.

Or a guilty person.  

Answer 5

I understand Kate's answer and i don't agree with it....Doe's that make me dumb?.

Answer 6

Would anyone feel comfortable answering questions to a man who did all this

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...

Answer 7

I think it very unwise and condescending to suggest anyone who differs in opinion to be 'dumb'. I am quite capable of making my own mind up based on the facts and evidence available. What makes you so sure that kate is innocent? What would make good sense would be to make sure your children were cared for properly at all times. They didn't and have shown nothing but arrogance to anyone who dare suggest they were negligent. You are convinced of their innocence, I am convinced of their guilt but what sickens me the most is that it's all about the Mc's and how they feel! I feel so sorry for the twins having to live in the shadow of two of the most contemptible people I have ever been forced to meet.

Answer 8

Many people lose objectivity when the hate cloud stemming from with hunt occurs. People do not understand.  I would never answer questions to build a case against oneself either. The whole thing is maybe she was being setup maybe not. Who knows. Someone needs to help and mother should know answer.

Answer 9

Sad that people play judge and jury.  

Answer 10

She is a very selfish woman, they could have had there daughter with them now if it wasn't for there arrogance in hampering the investigation in this way.

I just wonder when they grow up, what the other 2 kids will make of their parents actions which led to them loosing their sister.

Its up to the police an independent body, to decide what is relevant not for members of the family who could have been responsible :)

EDIT : It's not about sitting in jail its about finding the kid for heaven sake !!

Answer 11

agree with your point about a possible set up and she had a right to remain silent. however she has still not given satisfactory answers to pertinent questions even though she is now in the uk.

Answer 12

I am not dumb, thank you very much. To say someone is dumb just because they don't agree with your interpretation of the situation is very arrogant.

'Apart from the miscarriage of justice against herself, she knew that the investigating authorities were wasting precious time barking up the wrong tree, when they should have been searching desperately for her Madeleine.'

This is what doesn't make sense to me. How can people know 100 percent that this is what she was thinking?

How do you know that she ISN'T guilty? How do you know that she refused to answer those questions because she was innocent?

What you people don't seem to realise, is that finding Maddie INVOLVES questioning her parents if they have reason to believe they are suspect (which they did, on the coincidental evidence of the sniffer dogs alone).

You can't say that Kate refused to answer because the police were barking up the wrong tree. How do you know they were? How do you know that's what Kate was thinking?

Personally, whether I was labeled a suspect or not, I would answer every question they put to me about my child - to not do so would be to hold the investigation up and deny the police important information.

I would have nothing to hide. I'd be screaming everything I remembered from the rooftops, even if I were about to be lynched by the police suspecting me.

It's not about a witch hunt, sweetie, it's about making the people realise that questioning the parents in this way is very connected to finding out what happened to Maddie. To say that Kate not answering was perfectly acceptable because she is innocent is a fallacy.

Being dumb comes from assuming. So who is dumb? People who just assume that she didn't answer the questions out of innocence? Or people who realise that it isn't normal practice of an innocent person, specifically in her situation regarding her CHILD, and are wondering more.

Why would she care about going to prison? Surely information on her child is more important. Besides, she could have appealed if they sent her, and the investigation would have opened again with the detailed information she provided.

They can't send someone to prison on questioning alone. They need evidence.

Oh wait... they did have coincidental evidence against the McCanns...Shame. Maybe they could have sent her to prison after questioning.

...But, in that case, who are we to say that it would be the wrong decision?

Yes, innocent until proven guilty, by all means:- But not innocent even in the light of guilt.

To say that they did it solely to set her up is ignorant and again assumptions. Where did you get this information from? The McCanns views? Do you see the circular going on there, making it another fallacy? You need to start thinking about this without the cloud of their public announcements in your mind. Not everyone is as truthful and honest as you or I.

Oh, and for the record:- I don't think you're dumb because you interpret her actions and words differently to me. Ok?

Answer 13

Yes people have lost their objectivity in the cloud of hate Faith.

Look at this (link) I can't believe that this person has been alowed to get away with Madeleine, and furthermore that the Police did not show the world.

Does the woman look like Murats swinging girlfriend to you?

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/a...

Shady stop thumbing me down when I show you stuff that is contrary to your skunked up thoughts. LOOK at the link .

Answer 14

Thank goodness! I was beginning to feel like a voice in the wilderness!