Question:

Are the foxtel commentators on drugs?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

they come on and these clowns say wests have a real good chance because melbourne have lost 3 of there last 4 away games, but fail to mention these 3 games they lost they had 10 players out for origin, what a bunch of clowns they looked when the storm smashed them

 Tags:

   Report

13 ANSWERS


  1. they must be if they thought wests had any chance


  2. lol. some things commentators say somtimes make no logical sence at all

  3. they guys who were on mon were from perth so maybe yes

  4. The Australian TV Commentators are not commenting on the game, they tell stories and are biased to one team. The best ones are the NZ and British ones hands down

  5. The Tigers actually play well against the Storm. If you watched the first half you would notice that the Tigers were definitely the better team. I'd say the majority of the times the Tigers have played Melbourne in the past two seasons they have won. Its just one of those teams that they play well against. Like how Manly play against the Roosters, and how the Eels play against the Tigers.

    They weren't actually that off the mark in predicting the Tigers would win. However, Melbourne did have an extremely good side and that showed in the second half.

  6. the guys your talking about are good friends with Ben Cousins

  7. yes

  8. No, but I don't think melbourne should have a team in the competition either. They should move to the NSW Central Coast where they are needed!

  9. i usually try to watch channel 9.

  10. I find the sports television commentators (Foxtel or 9) to be of a rather poor quality, far too many are employed because they are ex players and know someone who knows someone than being good at the main part of the job which is giving a good concise flowing report on the game.

    I sat thru the Knights V Panthers 9 dribble..... I find myself comparing it to English Soccer or American Basketball where you have informed reporters with an occasional ex player involved, or as most often find myself doing looking to ABC radio for quality commentary on league games.

  11. too true (but they have to pretend it will be a contest for the ill informed viewer so they keep watching)

    unfair origin stifles the storm

    but hey it happened for years to the broncos then the roosters (and still is) so get used to it

    it is a sign of success and if good enough storm will overcome this period

    i am a roosters fan but think the storm are specials again this year (too much talent and well coached)

    still not sold on the eagles though

  12. i hate melbourne, not part of the question but i thought i should put that out there

    tigers had no chance of winning

    melbourne are just to good :|

    for teams like that any way

    round 22 brookvale oval manly will smash the storm

    :):):)

    go manly!

  13. true i watched the game it wasnt bad but storm just have to many superstars e.g slater and inglis played well,  i am a dragons supporter and we had the lucky draw of versin storm without there origin players , although dragons won they were pretty much versing a completley different weaker team

    i dont think it is fair on the storm

    ps. jason nightingale is my hero .. haha

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 13 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions