Question:

Are these pictures of real ghosts...?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U3xfbZhPo0

 Tags:

   Report

23 ANSWERS


  1. Some possibly YES, others maybe, and some NO. Good goosebump material, though-thanks for the link. If some hadn't flown by so fast, it would be more enjoyable. Ghosts are real, hard to photograph, and harder to verify. The claimant must have a sterling character, no one who knows them personally could say anything ill of their integrity and scientific excellence. Liked the music--bolshy!


  2. While I will not refuse the possibility of ghosts existing, I don't think there were any "real" ghosts in those pictures. If you have the discovery channel, "A Haunting" is a pretty good ghost show. They stories are only reenactments of peoples experiences but they are REALLY detailed and awesome to watch. Be careful though, they may make you want to sleep with a light on LoL

  3. Maybe a few of them but mostly fakes. Or camera glitches.

  4. 4 real it went pretty fast : ) but some of em looked pretty convincing

  5. Well, if it didnt fly by so GD FAST!! Half I couldn't even see!!!

  6. Some possibly YES

  7. Some are, the others are well-known fakes.

  8. no

  9. Unfortunately for psuedoskeptics (that believe nothing unusual is worth their time to investigate) and real scientist alike one can not look for mere seconds at these pictures and confirm them as fakes or genuine.

    One would have to actually investigate the time, location, witnesses, and undertake analysis of each photograph one by one carefully investigating it before one could reach a legitimate conclusion. Some like the girl floating I believe are acknowledged fakes (by the people that created them).

    Also, most digital images are useless because there is no film/negative to examine for tampering and photoshop can do almost anything. There are some one time CD/DVD cameras that preserve the original images but other than that digital is useless as evidence.

    Conclusion: inconclusive based on insufficient

                          information.

    Psi

  10. some of them were certainally unexplainable but many of them looked like double exposed film at the hands of an amatuer as well as cameras that were leaking light into the film case, bad film, reflection, old film.

  11. Too make a case that these were photos of ghosts, the least you would need to do is get better quality photos and obtain credible confirmed information on the photographer and the conditions under which the photos were taken. At least at that point you may be able to do some kind of investigation. Unfortunately, all you have is Youtube and I've become a bit cynical that much of anything on Youtube is legit.

    After going through the photos, personally I don't think there is much reason to conclude that any were paranormal, though I certainly cannot offer absolute proof that they weren't.

  12. No..looks like double exposures to me....

  13. Ectoplasm is questionable.

    Depending on the temperature outside, it could be a persons breath.

    Orbs?

    Could be insects or dust. Maybe even ice crystals if there is high humidity in freezing temperatures.

    Those really old photographs are also questionable.

    Photographers used double exposures to make a photo appear to have a ghost in it.

    Or they would use smoke and mirrors.

  14. i think some of them might be, but some are just things that went funny on the film, i seen a show that disputes things like this and explains how things could appear on a picture like that.

  15. Looks like it to me

  16. Most of these are just matrixing or illusions, but there are 2 in there that I believe to have been researched and analyzed to be found real, the one of the young girl looking over the railing, and the stage coach picture.

  17. No, it's double exposure.  Give me an old camera and I'll show you how to reproduce pictures like that.

  18. This was too scary for me, I had to stop it after a couple of seconds.  Where did you get this ???

  19. I don't believe those of the Twin Towers..there have been so many of those done. Some of the others looked real You have to "pause" on many of them to be able to see them. Thanks!

  20. double exposures  is what it is.

  21. All that it looks like to me is double exposure.

  22. Oh my goodness! These are real proofs that ghost really exist... From now on, I'll sleep with the lights on... I don't want to see glowing spirits in the dark....

  23. No. Appearance like this only suggests that our perception has been deceived.

    No such thing as ghost, or else, it could be placed under the control of man.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 23 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.