I teach Kenjutsu, and have broken from normal practices. I have studied the Kata of many different styles, and have come to my own conclusion of Kenjutsu. I am not satisfied with mearly mastering the Kata passed down. We have Randori frequently, but it is not mearly a competition of existing methods. We each have our own strategies in that complement who we are. There are no ranks and no tests other than how we are progressing. I have tried to incorporate the quick thinking neccessary for battles into Randori, with great results for those I teach. Is this wrong? I have come under a lot of criticism from others who think I should preserve an existing Ryu. Kenjutsu Ryu evolved over many years to make up for the changes in battle. Even though using a sword in battle no longer happens, does the evolution have to stop? If we forget how the techniques were meant to be used, are we not mearly mimicking the styles? Can we truly appreciate the hard work of past masters by mimicking?
Tags: