As a juror what would you think?

Question

a girl works at a bank

she cashed a check under mr smiths account on last day of work

check goes missing, mr smith says he never cashed a check that large before.

security says that the girl cashed a "fake check" then took the money

security says that they never checked her work station only the back room.

security tapes reveal nothing out of the ordinary, never see the girl take any money. mr smith is with the girl the entire time the transaction was done

bank managers have lied under oath saying the only way she could cash the check was with an unauthorized code that she was NEVER given.

bank employee handbook tells employees how to use this code and needs a managers approval in order for it to be processed.

so my question is how can this girl be found guilty of this crime?

security admitted that they did not see anything on the tape and that her work station was never checked, asst manager lied about an unauthorized code being used when it is clearly in the employee handbook. isn't it possible mr smith accidently was given back the check then lied saying he never cashed the check that way he got free money?

if you were the jury would you find this girl guilty?

Answer 1

well here's the thing... jury is 12 people. they all have to be convinced that Girl is guilty.

banks make mistakes, after all they are human employees. if there is not physical evidence, then i would plea not guilty and take my chances at trial.  people want to see with their own eyes proof of something done wrong.

HOWEVER this is a small amount of information to base an opinion on over someones freedom. my suggestion's this:

LISTEN TO YOUR ATTY that is why you pay him/her

Answer 2

Not guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, no.