As the republicans replay footage of the attacks on 9/11, why do they never mention that it happened ...?

Question

on their watch? How typical and two faced is that?

Answer 1

It would have happened under either party .Don't forget that it happened to the United States,all of us.These people who hate Americans don't care who is in charge they hate all of us.Terrorist  attacks took place under Clinton's watch also. Clinton had a change to bring  Osomo in also but didn't under his watch.Quit trying to blame such a horrible act on our country place it where it belongs.We should all stand together against those who hate us because we are Americans .Not let them divide us and blame each other.  

Answer 2

Why don't you libs ever mention the fact that under Slick Willy, the FBI was within 30 yards of capturing bin Laden and twice Clinton told them not to?

It's sad when your own so-called "argument" actually proves someone else's.

Answer 3

Frankly I think it would have happened whether the Republicans or Democrats were in the White House.  I think it was the result of a systematic failure of our intelligence and defense over a number of years.

Answer 4

About 15 minutes into their watch.  However, if you read about Bill Clinton's foreign policy you can certainly learn more about where it all started.

Here's the synopsis (from BN) of the book that tells it all:

"Lt. Col. Robert Buzz Patterson exposes the terrifying, behind-the-scenes story of the years when the most irresponsible President in our history had his finger on the nuclear trigger. Dereliction of Duty is the inside story of the damage Bill Clinton did to the U.S. military and how he compromised our national security. From his laughable salutes, to his arrogant, anti-military staffers, the message came through loud and clear: the Clinton Administration had nothing but contempt for Americas men and women in uniform.

Dereliction of Duty is the book every American concerned about our national security has been waiting for written by a military man who was an eyewitness inside the Clinton White House, and who can no longer in good conscience keep silent."

Read it if you want the truth or just ignore it if you want to keep your head in the sand about how these things work.

Answer 5

If Democratic Bill Clinton had taken out Bin Ladin after his attack on the U.S.S Cole when he was in our scope these acts never would've happened. Period. But he didn't have the Balls and neither will Obama, h**l he's part of his family tree. I am grateful that we had a President who did have the Balls to Stand Up and Defend our Country and the Honor of the thousands whose lives were taken and the families they left behind. Had he not our Country wouldn't be as safe as it is now. How many attacks have been stopped since then because of the measures that Bush took for our Safety. I say Stand Up for Your Country, Fight for what's Right and Against what's wrong, and Elect a Man who has the Balls to Protect your Rights to sit in your Air conditioned home and spew your views. Who cares whose "watch:" it was on. If it had been under Clintons watch we would've never stood up for ourselves and these Extreme Muslim Terorrist would be at your front door instead of Our Hero Soldiers who Sacrifice time with their own families to protect yours fighting over there to keep them at bay. I'm not saying Yay War but I am not naive in thinking we should just take it up the a** and let our people be killed for no reason. These people torture their own what do you think they'd do to you?

Answer 6

Because then, they wouldn't be able to blame Bill Clinton and the liberals!

It's a lost cause.  They don't dare compare Barack Obama to Bill Clinton, because then he'll win.  So they're comparing him to Jimmy Carter.  Never mind that even with 1980, Carter created more jobs per year than Ronald Reagan.  Who, don't forget, MADE Saddam Hussein, and gave the Afghan rebels what they needed to become the Taliban and al-Qaeda.  But he's Saint Ronald, and you can't say that!

Answer 7

Very typical.

Answer 8

Or..........how about the years of planning that went on prior to 9/11, all during the Clinton presidency, but he was too busy banging interns to do anything about it.

Answer 9

It's also incredibly disrespectful and underhanded to use something so tragic as a tool for their own benefit and fear mongering.

If BushCo hadn't ignored the many warnings that the attack was going to happen and hadn't dropped Clinton's covert "shoot to kill" operations on Osama bin Laden, it would have never happened.  Why would anyone want to vote that into office again?