Astronomy, astrology and inquiry - part 2?

Question

Reference my last question:

4 minutes after midnight, August 29, 2007, the precise position of non-planetary bodies in relation to Boston, Mass, included M19 at azimuth 119.73 degrees.

At almost that precise moment the Massachusetts State Lottery keno [4 minute interval] draw was:

897606 08/29/07 07-11-15-17-22-25-27-32-42-44-46-48-56-6...

8/27/2007, M19 azimuth 119.75 was at 17:56:53.

At almost that precise moment the Massachusetts State Lottery keno [4 minute interval] draw was:

897606 08/29/07 07-11-15-17-22-25-27-32-42-44-46-48-56-6...

8/27/2007, M19 azimuth 119.25 was at 17:57:53

At almost that precise moment the Massachusetts State Lottery keno [4 minute interval] draw was:

896955 08/26/07 06-10-11-22-29-32-40-41-42-47-48-49-50-5...

This type of historical information concerning lottery draws is available going back many years for many locations.

Question: Is the method valid?

Answer 1

I must admit to being more than a little confused here and may be missing the point entirely.

However, if the results of any tests are irrelevant, doesn't that then also make the method invalid?

It just seems to me to be too random to form any hypothesis based on one Massier object - in this case a globular cluster.

It is found also at RA 17h 02m 37.69s, Dec -26° 16′ 04.6″Mag 7.47, Dist. 28.0ly

The randomness of a Keno Draw could also be compared to with these parameters also could it not?

Why not use another Messier object also viewable from the same location at the same time?

Again, just a thought here as  like I said, I may be way off the mark in trying to decipher what you are tiring to achieve in your methodology.

Edit: yep, see told you I was confused!