Atheist: If you could go back in time and have one person in the Bible assassinated who would it be?

Question

Atheist: If you could go back in time and have one person in the Bible assassinated who would it be?

Answer 1

If I could go back in time I wouldn't find most of the people mentioned in the bible because they never existed in the first place.I.E. Noah, Moses, and Jesus, besides why would I want to kill someone? I have a much higher moral standard than you theist.  

Answer 2

Eve. We'd live forever if she hadn't have gone and messed it up.

Answer 3

God.

Answer 4

if they can go back in time, they will see that there was no such thing as evolution

Answer 5

Violence is the last resort of the incompetent. It would not be Christ because there is no evidence he even existed. The first record of him is the new testament which was not written till 150 to 200 years after christ supposedly lived. So there was no one alive who actually witnessed any of these events who could have relayed them first hand. In fact the average life expectancy 2000 years ago was only 30-35 years so there was 9 or 10 generations between when Christ supposedly lived and the time of the first written records. Hardly reliable accounts. At best the stuff of legend. Christ has good company, Paul Bunyan, Pecos Bill, John Henry. All great legends with exaggerated deeds.

Answer 6

Moses, for all the ethnic cleansing he perpetuated.

Answer 7

ADAM AND EVE, THEN I WOULDN'T BE PLAGUED WITH QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEANING OF LIFE.

Answer 8

That wouldn't be possible because the people in the bible never existed.  

Answer 9

Moses, He started the whole book of fairy tales!

Answer 10

Paul he was the cause of this mess .

Answer 11

No one, why would I want to??

Answer 12

can I kill pink unicorns too?

Answer 13

its true that, the he first time mohammed married almost double his age older woman ( a mother figure)

muslims say around age 40, mohammed attained prohpesy...

after attaining prophesy only.. mohammed married that 6yrs old child girl and as soon as the child girl got matured(physically) he had s*x with her

well, i tell you..

MORALS are always MORALS, now or 1400 yrs ago, its not about Laws, its not about traditions, Mohammed was already a prohpet, supposed to have communication with God.. being a wise man, he shouldnt have done this, How can mohammed marry & have s*x with that Tiny girl? the girl though matured physically, she was still a child, she wasnt matured mentally at all

(muslims support marrying the child girl by..

Mohammed needed a wife to see his house hold things & to look after his children

lmao, how can this 6 or 9 yr old girl look after his children & do house hold works? (child-labour?)

and some say, he didnt have s*x at 9 may be later, they simply "lived" together

well, if this was the case, why they started immidiately after her v****a got broadened? why not immidiatelly after marriage when she was at 6)

and to SUPPORT women, he need not to MARRY every WIDOW, he can protect those women by simply Giving Maintanance Money & Ordering other Men around.. not to Harrass them Physically

but this WISE Man.. wants s*x s*x.. Mohammed Lured.. someone else's Wives!

its a bitter truth, mohammed was a characterless, woman-phycho

Mohammed was supposed to eradicate bad systems, but he simply followed the tradition, Married TOO Many Women that he can shake his STICK at, this clearly states, he wasnt a prohpet, he was a "FAKE"

Answer 14

I'd probably pick Paul.

Answer 15

Moses. Though of course he would tell me "thou shalt not kill". I'd pick Moses because of all the harmful laws he made.  

Answer 16

Enoch.

Because his name is far to futuristic.

Answer 17

Paul.  

Before he "met" Jesus.

Answer 18

hey this is a dumb question. how old are you 12?

Answer 19

If the people actually existed, then I would definitely get Abraham. What a douche.

Answer 20

No one. The bible is fake