BB9 Is it ever fair for housemates to be immune from nomination ?

Question

As head of house Rex was immune when everyone would have nominated him & it's not the first time we've been stuck with people we've hated who would otherwise would have been up for the vote

Answer 1

i think its unfair except for when u come in like sara and maysoon came in   its ok because its sad to only be there for a week but thats the only time its fair

Answer 2

Well no its not "fair". But nobody ever said Big Brother was supposed to be fair.

And hey, it makes for good tv.

Answer 3

nah ally its not fair really, but we all no its manipulated, shame its never manipulated to keep any interesting in.

Answer 4

fix of course ,the way they kept rex in he should have been gone long ago

Answer 5

nothings fair!

Answer 6

They nicked that idea from BB USA - and you're right it's not fair especially now Mo is HOH and therefore guaranteed a place in the final. HOH Should of been scraped this week.  

Answer 7

Everything in this show is manipulated.

EVERYTHING.

Do you really think programme makers are going to leave to chance who is evicted etc?

Phone lines are there to make money. The public aren't actually controlling anything. There's plenty of evidence to show that they are not trustworthy or (sometimes) even genuine.

If Rex was kept in, it's because prog makers wanted it that way - another example of manipulation.

Answer 8

I totally agree with Phil....

Answer 9

lmao...Mo is strangely immune this week...

not sure he would have been mominated ..but if he was.. he would definitely go...

dr bad

say NO .. to bogey MO!!

Answer 10

Fix I hear everyone cry - well they did in my house !!!

Answer 11

Nope cos thats not the name of the game ...the public decide ...so we should be given the ability to decide between all of them!

Although i can see why they have an appointed leader, its the whole 'god complex' which is guaranteed to create tension and arguments which makes for fantastic (supposedly) viewing!!