Before or after *pictures*?

Question

I got a cut and colour yesterday, how do I look?

Before:

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r244/meggie_24_1995/Megs24535.jpg

After:

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r244/meggie_24_1995/l_57dea43dc88babbc6344f5317802a93e.jpg

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r244/meggie_24_1995/Megs24552.jpg

Sorry about the last picture, its the only one I have of my whole face and the hair cut xD I was caught off guard by my friend xD

So, anyways, which one looks better,

rate me 1-10 for the before and the after,

and which one makes me look older?

:)

thanks!

- Meg

Answer 1

You're beautiful, before and after. I think the "new" look makes you look a little older.

A big smile couldn't hurt ;-D

Answer 2

you need to get a bronzer so your freckles arnt as prominent.. your hair cut looks real pretty but (im just being honest here) your freckles and ghostly pale skinn needs a tan or something.. I use to live in california so i guess thats prob why it looks wierd for me... anyways good haircolor choice.. you should dye your hair brown, the blond makes you look washed out..  

Answer 3

8D YOUR SO CUTTEEE.

I love the after.

Looks more snazzy!

:]

Answer 4

you look good in both.

i'm a fan of your new cut, it certainly flatters you. i must say, your natural color is nice and unique, and you really didn't need to do anything to change it, and i'm really not getting a great idea of the color change with those last two pictures. but i think the cut was a good choice, it makes you stand out a bit more.

EDIT: also, in response to Mrs. Edward Cullen, pale girls can be cute too, and i'm really not a fan of everyone who feels like there's a certain "look" that everyone needs to strive for. Meg doesn't live in california, and doesn't need to look tan if she doesn't want to. I'm agreeing that the blonde probably isn't the best color though, but i prefer her natural ginger to boring brunette :)