Benefits scroungers- compulsory sterilsation of welfare recipients?

Question

Single mothers, multi-dads/mums, and other social parsites- the bell tolls for thee.

The taxpayer has had a gutfull and if you think next election th Tories won't swerve further Right wing than Thatcher, you've got another thing coming.

A tale of atypical Blair-Brown lumpenproles (with thanks to the leggy Ms Moonlight for link):

http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/scroung6.htm

"Carl & Samantha Gillespie, w 12 children, have moved into a detached period house, 8 bedrooms, a garden, own driveway and all set in a leafy residential area of Newbury, Berkshire.

It's the type of highly-desirable family home that is well beyond the reach of many middle-class professionals but they've been given the keys without paying a penny.

Couple, receive £44,000 in benefits a year, have been housed in the £500,000 property by their local council. benefits include £1,500 /mth housing, £1,200/mth child taxt, £560/mth child benefits, £280 job seeker's...

Perfect candidates for the workhouse?

Your opinions?

Answer 1

Ooh the political incorrectness. brilliant.  Yes. those benefit spongers should be 1. sterilised, 2. sent into accommodation they have to pay fore and 3, be forced to give 9 of their children away so they don't spend as much and can't claim benefits on anything else.

Answer 2

Why stop there, we can put the immigrants in some sort of camps too and none of this free nhs rubbish either, the sick can't work or the handicapped into the ovens you go...your figures are wrong too, they wouldn't get £280 per month job seekers, what else is not true here mmm?Also it wouldn't work, would just increase crime and ultimately create more unemployed.

Answer 3

We do need a "final solution" to this problem, I would suggest forcibly removing them from their homes and putting them in camps where they will be forced to work for nothing. Feed them filth from the gutter and gas those who rebel with Zyklon B gas manufactured by ICI.

Oh, and while we are at it, exterminate all who oppose you.

You are a disgrace to this great nation and a vile piece of n**i filth. We fought a war 60 years ago to rid the world of your kind, you must be genetically modified for you dominant imbecility and bigotry gene to show itself, why are you on this planet?

Answer 4

Well your premise that cutting welfare to increase growth and efficiency in the economy is not bourne out by history.

You could look at the New Deal under Roosevelt that created social security, a minimum wage and huge state spending projects which brought the US to superpower status.

You could look at New Labour who brought in the minimum wage, tax credits, welfare to work, increase pensions, underwent the biggest public spending in memory and a fairer tax system. What happened...38 consecutive quarters of growth, the lowest unemployment since the second world war and the lowest interest rates since the early twentieth century.

Of course scroungers should be dealt with but what about the non-domiciles that cheat the country our of millions? I know things are turning now but labour brought 10 years of prosperity, this is a fact.

Answer 5

Marvelous idea..We could start with that family scroungers extraordinaire...AKA The royal family

Answer 6

Of course, think of all the money that could be spent on bombs and bullets to kill innocents abroad if there weren't so many scroungers taking it.

Answer 7

No much point "doing" women who have gone through the menopause or old age pensioners! An unnecessary expense don't you think? Why not euthanize everyone with an IQ less than a hundred... whoa! No, you couldn't do that without being boiled down for soap yourself could you? (And also, by the look of it, most respondents to your ridiculous question!) What has happened to you to make you so vicious and inhumane? Nobody could be so black hearted for no reason. In my opinion you need professional help. Try ringing the Samaritans. You cannibalistic neanderthals make me ashamed to call myself British.

Addendum:

Sorry Mr. Bullock but you are incorrect about both my political affiliation and employment status. I have never been unemployed since I left university three degrees and seven years worth of higher education later. In point of fact I pay the higher rate of tax - I suspect you are probably in receipt of the minimum wage yourself - but do not begrudge this levy because I want to continue to live in a decent and humane society where children are well nourished and the elderly don't have to shiver in the cold in their homes every winter. And yes! I do want the unemployed and other categories of the unwaged to be financially protected. Substitute the word "Jew" for "benefit scrounger" in your diatribe and we might as well be back in n**i Germany before WW2. How disappointed I am in my countrymen that your primitive and pathological views garnered any support whatsoever. If you harboured the faintest scintilla of humanity in your heart or soul you would feel shame for what you have written here. I suspect that sadly you have neither known or will ever know either shame or love.

Answer 8

They need to be nuetered.  If it was policy to do it at birth by postcode this sort of thing wouldn't happen!

Answer 9

I feel so sorry for Crewe with imperial c unts running their town. Your picture says it all, mate. Its no wonder the world hates us.

Answer 10

Put them all to work bring in a law that thew must work a min of 30 per week  that includes clean the streets,grave yards etc

why should we work for money we get and all they  have to do is get up in time to sign on

Answer 11

Brilliant. As a tax payer I resent every single penny these work shy, bone idle people get. This is MY money that I work for that I want to keep for my own family. With inflation looming, pay rises falling and the general cost of living rising daily, charity now begins at home. Personally I feel it's sink or swim now for these people. If they have made the lifestyle choice not to work, that's fine, it will just be a hungry lifestyle, those of us who actually work for a living a are fed up with paying an increasing amount for the workshy, those with multiple families becasue they can't hold down a relationship for more than a year, those who fail to take responsibility for their own decisions in life and chavs who should simply have been drowned at birth - you're in our target sights!

Answer 12

Are you suggesting only the rich can breed?

Answer 13

Well done New Labour!   A perfect "social outcome" in line with the Brown model of wealth redistribution and suppression of initiative.

Answer 14

these people are the epitomy of scroungers. there is no other reason to conceive so many children.

Answer 15

Absolutely!

Answer 16

With you all the way on this, bit heavy regarding the sterilization

but true in every other respect. Things would simply be better if only the first 2 children were eligible for benefit, unfortunately in a Brown environment where he has to try and buy  every vote, this will never happen.

Sorry peace100, you will never convince me that the Labour party did not rest on the laurels of the Tories for the first 7 years of government.

Answer 17

I think that you are nuts.

Answer 18

agree with you totally this country sucks.

Answer 19

I hope you have a inoperable tumor in your lung and your children get the same and you all die suffering, Since your so happy seeing other people suffering. People without basic intelligence are the ones concerned about themselves and not their fellow man . Don't bother responding your opinion is meaningless judging by that which you expouse. And I will not be checking back to read it anyway, You better head down to the hospital now and get that annual checkup!

Answer 20

Staggering but not at all surprising in modern Britain.

How is it that a working person has to pay for their ever rising dental bills, prescriptions etc but these parasites sit on their @sses all day long spitting out kids like Pistachio shells and get paid rather handsomely for it. Where on earth is the deterrent?

Although compulsory sterilisation is a tad extreme, they should be limited to how many children our taxes pay for, say the first 2. If you want more then get off your backide and fund your own family!

Fundamentally, why is it so easy to stay on benefits? Until THAT is addressed, expect to see more of these grockles carrying on regardless.

Answer 21

These people are a bunch of parasites, and they sit on their haunches while other people work for them... I blame the Government for giving out money willy nilly, and never tell them to go out to work....I have been poor years ago but went out to work and that put me back on my feet. I never expected other people to work for me.

Answer 22

The problem with compulsory sterilisation is that someone will bring up images of the n***s. Signapore had a similar program and it was somewhat effective.

Personally I'd support compulsory sterilisation fully.