Best camera to take pictures?

Question

like a really professional photography one.

doesnt matter the price.

Answer 1

Well, there is the Hasselblad H3dII that sells for $30,000. Also, Phase One has just introduced a digital back with 65 MP for certain medium format cameras. Probably looking at 50 thousand for the back alone. I have a 645 Mamiya AFD that this will work on... want to "lend" me the money since price doesn't matter? :-)

steve

Answer 2

for beginers i would definitally suggest the nikon D40.

if you want something more advanced i would look into the nikon d200

or the nikon d3, but the nikon d3 will run you about 5,000 dollars

Answer 3

just use the most expensive camera

Answer 4

Based on your question, it sounds like you really don't know all that much about photography yet, which leads me to think you don't need a super expensive, fancy, professional one, as all of the features will be wasted on someone who thinks cameras make good photographs, not photographers.

Answer 5

Price doesn't matter? Then get a Hasselblad!

Answer 6

nikon d40 without a doubt. i have one and i love it. its a professional slr. its a cheaper camera but its just as good as a 3000 dollar one. it takes great pics and is very good. look at my pictures taken with my nikon d40

Answer 7

Since you mentioned in your question that you don't care about the price, a really professional camera for studio shooting is the Hasselblad H3DII-50. It offers a class-leading 50 megapixel resolution, far more than the usual 10 megapixels you'll find on other cameras. Price? In excess of $37 000.



Or you can buy the far more practical Canon 1D Mark III. It features a wide range of lens and accessories and produces the best images of a SLR camera. Price? Around 5k.

Or maybe an entry level Nikon d40x. It features 10 megapixel resolution, good image quality, and interchangeable lenses. It also comes with a much more affordable $800 price tag.