Question:

Bodyguard debate part two?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Yesterday it got onto my notion that modern technology would make the need for a bodyguard useless. So what happens today other than been told most people that have a need for a bodyguard it is not for show but for insurace companies. Seems when you see Beyonce or any star with that man minding them it is not the record company or the artist but the insurance company that makes it a condition of the policy.

So its seems that the real addition to your ticket prices is for things like bodyguard, safety measures and all go to pay insurance companies?

Them evil insurance companies that in reality have us unable to go to close to horses at race meetings, unable to ride the fairground boat because we are to small. Have insurance companies destroyed us again?

 Tags:

   Report

2 ANSWERS


  1. It's not the insurance companies that are the problem. It is the amount of people who make claims for tiny things that drive the need for insurance companies to protect themselves that are the problem


  2. Nope, they are just protecting their profits from costly payouts.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 2 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.