Bush intends to punish Russia for invading Georgia?

Question

I just read this headline above on yahoo news ..

Thank You GWB for s******g one more time ...as a present for Obama ..

Answer 1

I have not heard this ..but anything is possible

Answer 2

Russia will never get punished. Look up GAZPROM (provided in sources) and you will understand why.

Answer 3

HE WANTS WAR SO WE ARE FORCED INTO MAKING HIM AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THE DICTATORS OF OUR COUNTRY....

IRAN DIDNT WORK , NORTH KOREA DIDNT WORK, SO WHY NOT TRY FOR RUSSIA......MORE WAR...WAR....WAR....WAR.....WAR.....WAR....

Answer 4

I'll give him this much. He is a fearless leader. Then again it's easy to be a fearless leader when it's someone else's life on the line.

Answer 5

yes

Answer 6

just makin the job easier for mccain

Answer 7

Why wouldnt that sursprise me

Answer 8

team america world police, i thought it was just a very funny movie, how so very wrong i am.

georgia started this whole thing by the way, hoping that the us would jump on board (as they have, with gusto), and why are they doing this, OIL and GAS.

does it ring any bells?  

Answer 9

He will proboly just play ding dong ditch on the Russian president and tepee his house. Georgia tryed defending its self and got ownd and if we use ANY military action against Russia they will punish us.

Answer 10

Your belief is midguided in this situtation and do not provide evidence for your belief that Bush is s******g up.  Russia needs to face the consequences for their actions as they attacked a soverign nation who was seeking membership within the international community as many former Soviet Bloc nations are doing at the current moment.  This also needs to warn them against further actions in the region which may disrupt other US allies.  If Russia continues this path should the US be Allies with all the other nations of Europe that is worried about Russia or should they be Allies with just Russia.  The best outcome would be for the US to remain Allies with the majority of countries possible.  

Now you are going to throw out that the US attacked a soverign nation when it went after Iraq.  There is a large difference in the actions that were involved (at this point you are considering I will use the WMD evidence that doesnt exist-I am sorry to disappoint you).  The fact of the matter is that as part of the deal for Iraq after the 1st Gulf war was that they were to be continuously inspected by NATO weapons inspections, which did not happen as per agreement.  

Weapons inspectors during this process were regualary taken off schedule from what was planned, this would make it possible to banned weaponry when you are leading the goose chase.  Eventually Iraq canceled all inspectors from entering their country closing off borders.  Another point to support Bush's original action was that Iraq was gassing Kurds (chemical weaponry was a banned weapon).  Last time I checked also gassing Kurds with chemical weapons is a form of Genocide when the numbers are high enough.  Through repeated misactions on Iraq's behalf they needed to face consequences which NATO was reluctant to handout beyond saying "quit it".  

Also note that Bush is not the only person making decisions at this time, while he is the leader of the country which gives him some significant power a Democratic Republic is set up with several checks and balances.  Thus Bush himself is not s******g up but rather at this point it would be in part also due to others involved in comming up with this punishment which would involve both a Democrate majority Senate and House of Representatives.  

Before you make an uneducated statement please do your research on the subject matter.  I understand if you are a member of a Liberal party you do not agree but at least you could put on a solid argument to support your belief.  

Answer 11

No link, no validity.

Answer 12

George Bush is a misguided idiot.  He has NO business sticking his egotistical nose into Russia's business.  He has no special right to punish anyone for anything.  Some country should up and punish HIM for a change and see how he likes it, the miserable twit.

The race is on to see how much more damage he can inflict on the US before his mangy butt is finally kicked out of the White House.

Answer 13

I think that although Russia used to be at odd with America, the US has no right to play world police in such a place.

Think if Texas tried to succeed from America, wouldn't the US military invade and put a stop to it?

I love the hypocrisy here, the US may be punishing Russia for an invasion that went safely, while the US military is still in Iraq...

I would not be too concerned about it honestly, although feelings there are a bit on edge, the US has two elects that will most likely pull out of Iraq and try to avoid the idea overseas combat...

Answer 14

YOu do know that Obama and Bush are related? And both are pigs. Bush  is going to punish Georgia? More like the US.

Answer 15

Why is everyone punishing russia for defending people who live in S Os. from a Georgian push to squash an uprising.  Heaven forbid someone steps in BEFORE a civil war broke out.