Specifically with regards to global warming... replacing technologies, paying for damages, etc.
I'm not interested in what's "right" or "wrong" to do such as any self-righteous feel-good blaming rants about the morality (there's a religious section on YA for that), just the mechanics of how it could (or would not) work.
For reference, I find this YouTube video very interesting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ&feature=email
Although it's about immigration, the points about global population and growth seem relevant to the discussion of whether or not a few people who currently manage keep themselves above the poverty/hunger level can really solve the problems in the countries that haven't reached that point by now.
Is the problem in poor countries really global warming, or will it boil down to poverty/hunger and population carrying capacity? How many hundreds of billions (or trillions) have been spent on the problem over the past decades, and with what results?
Tags: