Think of what overrated means. That is saying that some bands are not as good as people make them out to be. But have you ever asked yourself what makes a band good? Take for instance calling someone attractive. What makes a person attractive? Is it some kind of test they take? Do they get a card that says they are attractive? No, the only thing that makes a person attractive is that everyone agrees they are attractive. Jessica Alba did not get a blood test proving she is hot, what makes her hot is the fact that every guy thinks she is, and nothing more. This is the same with bands. There is no way to 'test' a band. You can look at how fast someone could play guitar, or how well they can sing, but is that how music is measured? If a band plays a guitar faster than another band, yet everyone says the band playing slower sounds better, then which is actually the better band? I hear all the time that the Beatles are overrated. This is not a Beatles debate, I just cannot think of another example. However, look at thier numbers. Isn't that what makes a band good? Sure some bands can play guitar or drums better, but if everyone agrees that the Beatles are better, are they not? Just like a good looking person. There is no way of determining which person is better looking, except for seeing who everyone picks. So if everyone picked a band to be great, how can they be overrated, when the only thing that makes a band good or not is how people look at them? Please try to fill me in with a logical explanation on how a band can be overrated?
Tags: