Can You Take "Matt Striker" That Seriously As A Commentator On ECW? ?

Question

Matt Striker doesnt suit the role in my view, it has been too much of a durastic character change. What do you think?

Answer 1

I tink matt needed more in ring experience and to become a champ before started commentating

Answer 2

I think he's been doing good. Matt Striker and Todd Girsham have good chemistry as commentators. Besides, WWE didn't have much to do with Striker and he wasn't getting used. I think he's a funny commentator.  

Answer 3

I think he's perfect for color commentary.  He sticks to his heel roots, but also looks at the business as an active manager, and knows talent when he sees it.  He never misses a beat on the mic, which is the kind of person Todd Grisham needs to work with, and he rarely antagonizes, but makes it known that he IS a heel on occasions during the show.

Answer 4

What do you mean character change?  He has always been a heel be it a wrestler or manager how is transitioning to announcer any different.  Its the perfect job for him.

Answer 5

i agree  with you

Answer 6

I AM AGREE WITH YOU MATT STIKER

CAN BE A GOOD HEEL FOR ECW BUT

WWE IS NOT PUSHING HIM I THINK

IF JOEY STYLES RETURN TO ECW'S

COMMENTATOR'S TABLE THAT WOULD

BE GOOD FOR ECW AND TAZZ & STYLES

STRIKER IS A WRESTLER NOT A JURK

HE NEEDS TO WRESTLE FOR ECW

Answer 7

IDK, he's a good heel, and has great mic skills. I think after a while he will be a perfect fit for ECW commentary.

Answer 8

your right tazz is better