Can a guy still have s*x while not having the Circumcision done when he is a baby?

Question

jus curios jus answer da question and no bad comments please Thank you and i wanted to know if it hurts them when they do it becuase im thinking about it when my baby boy is born

Answer 1

natural s*x is better, the vast majority of human existance was without circumcision, it was extremely rare to be cut until the early 1900's when the genital cutting was done to reduce the habit of masturbation

Answer 2

eric w is talking out of his butt again lie he does.

being cut or uncut makes no different at all

Answer 3

Obviously, humans have been around way longer than circumcision and if intact men couldn't have s*x then none of us would be here!

Leaving a p***s not circumcised is normal. You might like to know that 80% of the men in the world are never circumcised (and have no problems). It's not actually very common, and it's only done for religious reasons (Jews and Muslims) or tradition/culture reasons (USA), almost everywhere else in the world it doesn't happen.

Yes it does hurt the baby and there can be serious side effects. I would not circumcised a son if I had one.

Harriet

Answer 4

ofcourse, you know circumcision is a roughly new thing....when the p***s erects it stretches the skin that has not been removed over the p***s. How do you think we all got here...circumcision has not always been around ya know. It probably does hurt but they will not remember it. I think that circumcision is better because you have to worry about fungus getting into the folds of the skin and keeping it extremely clean when they are little. My nephew is not circumcised and his parents have had problems with fungus and potential infections due to staying ontop of being very clean down there.

Answer 5

Of course it hurts, whether done as an infant or an adult.

s*x is natural and better with a f******n than a scarred and mutilated p***s.

Circumcision destroys penile sensitivity and diminishes the size of the p***s also.     I think that anything that makes the p***s smaller isn't a good idea.

80% of the men in the world are intact--uncircumcised.     Look at the birthrates in the countries that don't habitually mutilate their baby boys and you will know that evidently they somehow manage to have a lot of s*x (and children) without being circumcised.

Daisey's answer isn't very good; look at all of the infections that women get--perhaps they should have female circumcisions done--yes, women can get circumcised, too.

Removal of the clitoral hood and labia would be cleaner, and would look better too.     Why doesn't  Daisey get herself scarred and mutilated before trying to convince others to do so?

Answer 6

I was circumcised but don't remember it. then again I was just born. it's worth getting. it makes it easier to clean since you don't have to pull the skin back. as far as s*x, he'll be able 2 when he's old enough, after he asks his girlfriend's father 4 permission 2 marry her and they get married @ the church. but some girls will think it's weird if he has the f******n, especially if he's not their first. go ahead and get it. it'll be easier on both of you.

Answer 7

yes they  can it is natural way of doing so during s*x

Answer 8

I was circumcised later in life and it was one of the best decisions i've ever made, I only wish my parents had me circumcised at birth.

Answer 9

most guys in the world are not circumcised and they can still have s*x.  if you are not sure, you should wait until he's old enough to decide because it should be HIS choice.    

Answer 10

80% of the world's males are intact, ie. not circumcised. s*x is actually better with an intact p***s as the f******n has important sexual functions. Circumcision also hurts the baby like h**l.

The f******n is an integral part of the p***s; measuring 15 square inches in an adult and accounting for over half the penile skin, lots of specialised nerve endings and the most sensitive parts of the p***s.

Not one medical organisation in the world recommends routine infant circumcision anymore but the US is the last western nation still doing this to about 50% of its newborn males. They still don't generally use anaesthetic either. It's child abuse, pure and simple.

The p***s forms as one organ and at birth the f******n is usually fused to the glans like a fingernail to its finger. So there is no cavity for germs and dirt to collect in until it separates naturally later; sometimes not till puberty or later. Only the boy himself should retract it and then he can be taught to skin back and rinse with plain water regularly.

Misguided attempts to retract too early, often by doctors and nurses, are the main cause of damage to boys’ foreskins and the real main reason for childhood circumcisions.

To perform a neo-natal circumcision the circumciser has to rip the f******n away from the glans with forceps. Then the f******n is either cut away or clamped until it falls off. Both methods cause the baby extreme pain and his raw glans and wound sting every time he urinates. It's quite common for the raw edges of the cut f******n to fuse to the raw glans during the healing process, forming skin bridges or tags. These complications and other more serious ones are often not found till puberty and do not show up in complication statistics.

More serious complications, though not common are immediate. Some babies lose their p***s to infection, bleed profusely (often because they are haemophiliac) or even die each year.  

The claimed benefits of circumcision are a beat up (based on flawed studies) and don't really exist but medical authorities have worked out that the overall complication rate is higher than all the benefits claimed by the pro-cutting advocates. One by one the claims are disproved but the pro-cutting zealots come up with more and keep quoting the old ones despite the evidence against them. For example you have more chance of dying from a circumcision or losing your p***s from infection than from penile cancer. The rate of penile cancer is higher in the largely-circumcised USA than in European countries where less than 1% of the male population is circumcised. Plus circumcised men have been found to have penile cancer, mostly on the scar. (Remember this is a very rare disease in intact or circumcised men).

A very recent study in New Zealand followed a cohort of boys through life from birth to age 32. About 40% were circumcised. The intact males had a slightly lower rate of sexually transmitted infections than the circumcised but there was no significant difference.

Using surgery to mutilate the genitals instead of washing in a modern western society makes no sense. Normal intact male genitals are, if anything, easier to wash than female ones and the same substance, smegma collects in the genital folds of both sexes. A few intact males have problems with tight f******n but this is only a tiny proportion of intact males. The condition can now be almost always treated with simple stretching exercises, sometimes in combination with a steroid cream that speeds up the process. However doctors who do not value the preservation of the f******n often still trot out circumcision as a first-option treatment in the US and even some other countries.

I am circumcised and hate it. I wish I'd been given the chance to choose for myself. Intact men can choose to get cut at any time in their life, though most have no desire to do so. The internet has shown that many men resent being circumcised. It's just not something that most of us talk about a lot, even to our parents.

Answer 11

It does not hurt a man to have s*x if his p***s is whole (not circumcised) - in fact, the f******n is one of the most sexually attuned parts of the p***s. It absolutely does hurt a baby to have part of his p***s amputated. Male circumcision is basically the equivalent of having the labial hood amputated on a baby girl. It takes about 3 seconds in the shower for a man to retract his f******n, rinse with clear water, and replace it. Not difficult at all.

Answer 12

The American Pediatric Association declared more than twenty years ago that there are no benefits what so ever to circumcision.

Most men are not circumcised. Most men have s*x dear...

Answer 13

So sad.

What kind of education do we have in America where kids can come out and ask this kind of ignorant question?

Only circumcised men can have s*x? I hope for your sake that you are in special education.

Answer 14

How about you?

Answer 15

The f******n was put there for s*x, and to protect the p***s.  s*x with a f******n is not painful, it is more pleasurable because half of the p***s skin was not cut off. It is better for the female partner too, because the f******n acts to help lubricate and has a gliding action during s*x.

Circumcision is what hurts(it is torturous pain that babies go into shock from) and can cause lifelong sexual problems. There are also risks to the babies when getting the surgery including infection, bleeding out (hemorrhage), accidental amputation of the glans, and even death. It is an unethical cultural tradition, but the rates of infant circumcision are dropping in the US and soon being intact will be the norm. You can see the purpose of the f******n here http://www.ksnocirc.org/facts.html

Answer 16

I am a circumcised man and it was not botched but I feel that I was mutilated against my will.

I am actually in the process of restoring my f******n non-surgically as I am extremely angry and disappointed that a healthy, functioning part of my body was removed for no good reason other than societal customs.

The risks are very small, but many boys have lost their penises due to botched circumcisions and some have even died due to bleeding or infection.

The risk is very small but it is a risk that I would never even consider when the alternative is to leave my son the way that he is intended to be and carries no risk of death or disfigurement.

http://www.icgi.org/

http://www.noharmm.org

http://www.nocirc.org

I think that it is important for everyone to read what's behind the following link.

http://knol.google.com/k/george-hill/cir...

PS - If you have Netflix, or Blockbuster Online I STRONGLY recommend that you watch the documentary, "The Business of Being Born". Everyone thinks of hospitals as the place to give birth but countries that have higher percentages of assisted home births have lower rates of maternal and infant mortality. A hospital birth is one that gives no respect to the way a woman's body works or her right to a natural birth.

http://www.thebusinessofbeingborn.com/

Answer 17

Uncircumcised men have s*x all the time. 80% of the men in the entire world are NOT circumcised. They procreate just fine. Circumcision is a relatively new invention, it only became popular outside of the Jewish and Muslim faiths in the past century. So for thousands of years, uncircumcised men have had s*x. Thats the way s*x is actually designed to work. It does not hurt for most men. Some may experience a little pain the first time. Women often experience pain the first time, but we don't pop the hymens of baby girls to prevent it. its no big deal and will go away.

As for your expected son, here is some mjore info on circumcision to help you decide.....

I would definitely advise you not to circumcise. It is unnessecary, painful, and not without serious risks. Here is some information, with links, to help you make your decision....

First, only 50% of boys nationwide are circumcised. You may actually find that your son is in the minority in the locker room if you cut him. (I don't advocate making this decision on those grounds, but if you were leaning towards doing it because you don't want him to be "different", you should know that the boys will be pretty evenly split between cut and intact and noone will think intact is weird)

Second, it is VERY painful to an infant. Most doctors still don't use any anesthesia, those that do rarely offer adequate anesthesia because the only stuff that works is not safe enough to use in infants for such a "minor" procedure. Further, some of the pain meds offered to infants aren't even reccomended for use on babies! Further, some doctors argue that it has beenb done "for thousands of years" without anesthetic- what they neglect to tell you is that a medical circumcision can take over 15 minutes to complete. A Jewish ritual circumcision, by contrast, takes under 60 seconds to complete (and the bay is given wine) Here is some info on the pain.....

http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/

http://www.circumcision.org/response.htm

http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/taddio2... (note in this one that even infants offered pain meds for the procedure showed signs of post traumatic stress!)

You should also know that studies have shown that the most sensitive parts of the male anatomy of ON the f******n- NOT the head of the p***s. By cutting off the f******n, you remove a mans most errogenous genital tissue. Here is a study about that.... (note that other studies found no difference, but they neglected to test the sensitivty of the f******n- they only tested the glans p***s of intact and cut men and didn't pay any attention to the f******n at all) http://www.nocirc.org/touch-test/touchte...

You should know that infant boys are EASIER to care for when they are intact. The f******n does not retract until late childhood or even puberty, so you do nothing special, just wipe the outside of his p***s clean and leave it alone. In a cut boy he will be extremely sensitive for a few weeks because the head of the p***s is raw and exposed (they have to tear the f******n off of the head in infants, it is naturally fused). During this time you will need to keep it VERY clean and may need to cover the wound with vaseline and guaze. Furthermore, to prevent painful and bleeding erections later in life, doctors are now commonly leaving more skin behind- in a cut boy this means you may have to push the left over skin back at every diaper change and clean beneath it to prevent it from readhereing or infecting. The very thing that mother's think they avoid by circumcising! In short-

Intact = wipe like a finger, NEVER retract

Cut= vaseline, clean thoroughly, push back remaining skin to prevent adhesions etc (the last step perhaps for several months or years)

Here is an excellent tutorial on the basics of intact care and circumcision....

http://www.lactivistintactivist.com/?pag...

Another factor in your decision is that circumcised boys experience a 12% increase in their risk of MRSA infection. MRSA is commonly picked up in hospitals (where circumcision is performed in non-sterile conditions) and has been known to kill adults. I wouldn't want to deal with it in an infant. Also, 12% is a BIG risk, the risk of a boy "needing" a circ later in life is WELL below that- under 1%. http://www.nocirc.org/publish/12-Answers...

The so called "benefits" of circumcision are generally trumped up. A big one now is that it "prevents" AIDS. All the studies showing "benefits" like this have been poorly designed and inconclusive. Also, for every study that finds a "benefit" there are more studies that find no benefit. http://www.icgi.org/

It is rather eye-opening to see how circumcision first became popular in the US to begin with. It was virtually unknown in this country until the 20th century. This slideshow takes you through the rise of circumcision.... http://youtube.com/watch?v=f4unKTMpBGA

Finally, you should watch a video or two of the procedure so you are fully informed of what your infant will go through. I will warn you that these are graphic. If you can't handle watching them as an adult, why would you expect your infant son to endure them?

There are two main methods for circumcision here is one of each-

Gomco Clamp- note that the father is in the room, and the doctor claims to have used anesthesia (although whether or not he did is debateable, and he is dissmissive about the whole idea) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Plastibell- I include this because some parents will have you believe it is "painless" or "requires no cutting/blood" I'll let you judge for yourself.....

http://youtube.com/watch?v=qaqQ5Glro84

Congrats on the new addition! I'm sure given all the facts, you'll make the right decision for your son. :) -Neb