Can anyone nominate themselves as an intelligent, open minded person who believes the official 911 narrative?

Question

Can anyone nominate themselves as an intelligent, open minded person who believes the official 911 narrative?

Answer 1

Occam's razor states that simple explanations are preferred over complex explanations (or something like that). That means that the simplest explanation is most likely the right one.

A bunch of pissed off Islamic extremists hijacking some jets and crashing them into buildings is much simpler than a massive goverenment cover-up/conspiracy. Therefore, the first explanation is more likely to be right. Besides, we all know our govermnet in inncapable of keeping a secret, especially one that big. Too many politicians dislike each other to keep something like that secret. Our government couldn't keep Watergate or Monica-gate secret, why should they be able to keep an attack on American people, on Ameircan soil by the American government secret? Besides, the terrorists claimed responsibility.

Answer 2

you dont have to be a conspiracy theorist to say "somthing is fishy"

1. There were bombs in the WTC dozens of eyewitness heard them, but the govt says they werent there

2. The 9/11 commission has a flight plan that is in direct conflict with the planes' flight recorder that hit the pentagon.

3. Eyewitnesses to the Pa. plane crash say it looked like someone dug a hole and threw spare parts in it (plane was probably shot down)

too many questions