Can global warming alarmist point me to some skeptical peer-reviewed papers?

Question

Can global warming alarmist point me to some skeptical peer-reviewed papers?

Answer 1

As I've mentioned before I've never run across any "alarmists" or "believers", but I sure will keep my eyes out for them and I'll let you know if any turn up.  I do know people like myself who know what the Sam Hill is going on in science, politics and the world in general.  I know you've met many of them here too, and I've seen them refer you hundreds of times to peer reviewed scientific work by the best scientists the planet has had in this field over the past Century.  I'm sorry to hear that none of that works for you, and you're holding out for these quasi-mythical alarmists, whatever they are.  About the only other thing I could  think of to help you out of your dilemma is we could get on the horn and call each and every one of those scientists one by one, alert them to your urgent need, and ask them to report any alarmist sightings in their area.  Would that help you out Dr. Smith?

Ah, then Bob326, I wish I could think of a polite name for you guys.  Denier and skeptic or variations of the two seem to be about as good as it gets.  I've never heard a better suggestion from any of you , and I find "Mr. X" or "Commander Gaffe" or "Dr. Smith" a bit stilted and pretentious, don't you?

You know I have the same problem really.  Everytime I come on here I find these rude uneducated snot nosed little b******s calling me and the other people here Liberals.  I'm a Conservative and proud of it, as are many of the people concerned about Global Warming.  No doubt you understand that as a Conservative, a taxpayer, registered Republican and combat veteran everytime one of these teenie weenie inbred litttle turds calls me a liberal I just want to kick his worthless homo *** into the next county.  I'm sure you do understand, so please pass it along if you run into any of the miserable little c**ks**k*rs yourself.

edit

Bob326, I pay no attention to the kinds of things you mention, and I'd recommend that you not pay any attention to them either.  They're silly, and have no relationship to Glabal Warming.  This is probably the reason you see all these alarmists and I don't.  No, I don't hate.  As I said the Red baiters p**s me off.  Nobody has a right to come in here and call me or anybody else a liberal or any other repugnant names.  If you want to defend the practice, then we have nothing to talk about.  The deniers do get tedious.  It's hard for me to understand people who have nothing better to do with their lives than to annoy people who aren't bothering them.  If they don't believe in Global Warming, so what?  It isn't my problem.  I just can't understand why someone would choose to go somewhere and heckle people who are concerned about something rather than finding something they themselves care about and devoting their time to that.  I mean they are not the belief police or anything.  What they h**l is wrong with them?

Answer 2

Using derogatory labels... that is sooo Rush Limbaugh.

YAWNNNNNNNNN.

Are you having trouble typing or do you not believe in using singular articles when you attempt to write in English?

Answer 3

its a trick question. there are none skptical of global warming written in the past 40 years

Answer 4

beelnite,

derogatory labels like "denialist"? Sounds pretty derogatory to me.

Tuba,

I don't know what to tell you--if you aren't seeing alarmists, then you have let your hate for "deniers" cloud your vision. They are everywhere. People who use the methane clathrates, super hurricanes, melting of the poles, every warm day, month, season, year as proof that the planet is going to h**l, shutdown of the the MOC, polar bears, mass extinction, mass starvation, cannibalism, big snows, small snows, super droughts, super heat waves, 1000 year floods, etc all in an attempt to force people into unnecessary and likely ineffective action. Most of these are unrelated, or unlikely to happen, but fear is their most effective weapon. You don't see alarmists? They are everywhere.

I certainly admit that there are "deniers" (those who say that extra CO2 has no influence whatsoever), and I prefer "skeptic" for myself.