Question:

Can sir richard branson sit in the house of lords?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Can sir richard branson sit in the house of lords?

 Tags:

   Report

17 ANSWERS


  1. No.He is not a peer.


  2. Is he Lord Branson? If not, then no - the clue is in the question

  3. No.  The House of Lords for the present is populated by elected peers [not sure who exactly elects them] and some hereditary peers.  Sir Richard Branson is not a peer and cannot therefore sit in the House of Lords.

    You can find out more about the House of Lords at these links : -

    House of Lords

    In the 15th century the House of Lords was the Upper House and the House of

    Commons the Lower House. Membership of the House of Lords was made up of the ...

    http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Plo... - Cached

    Parliament Live TV » home

    Live webcasts of proceedings from the UK Parliament comprising video feeds from

    The House of Commons, The House of Lords, Westminster Hall and an audio feed ...

    http://www.parliamentlive.tv/

    UK Parliament - House of Lords

    Bank of England, House of Lords Appointments Commission, duty-free allowance and

    geography in schools Read the queries and responses in Hansard ...

    http://www.parliament.uk/about_lords/abo... - Cached

    UK Parliament - Parliament Home Page

    What's On in the Lords Future business in the House of Lords ... Current appeals

    and recent judgments from the Law Lords within the House of Lords ...

    http://www.parliament.uk/ - Cached

    House of Lords - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    The House of Lords is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom

    and is also commonly referred to as "the Lords". The Parliament comprises the ...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lo...

    Note that the House of Lords is only called the Upper House for purely historic reasons.  The highest court in the land is the House of Commons - this is where the laws are made and where the people's representatives [Members of Parliament] debate the issues which conern the people.

    A lot of people, including myself, would like to abolish the house of lords and put in it's place an all elected chamber but with a new name.  Lords is too old fashioned and not in keeping with Cool Britannia etc.

  4. No.   He is a knight.   This means he has the title of "Sir".   So do Baronets by the way.   Neither us a Lord.

    Baron's, Viscounts, Earls, Marquesses and Dukes are Lords and so can sit in the House but only if a) they were created to the title (excluding almost all the Viscounts, Earls, Marquesses and Dukes and most of the barons),  b) they are hereditary lords (of any of the ranks listed above) and were elected by other hereditary lords, c) if they are the Earl Marshal or the Lord Great Chamberlain who, apart from the monarch are the only remaining Hereditary members of the house of Lords or are d) senior bishops of the Church of England.

  5. He isn't a Lord, so no.

  6. No because he has a beard, and that is never allowed in the house of lords

  7. They wouldn't let him have the lottery from Camelot.

    I don't think the ruling classes have let him in yet.

    They are still paying them selves big fat cheques from the lotto.

  8. Well,first he'd have to be an HEREDITARY peer,and just not a knight(he's only a knight).Then,he'd have to win appointment from the other Lords;a position on the House is an elected position now.

    From http://www.lordsappointments.gov.uk

    "In May 2000 a historic change was made to the way in which non–party–political members of the House of Lords are appointed. The Appointments Commission was given the key role of recommending to Her Majesty The Queen the names of individuals we think should be appointed on merit.

    We ask the public to self–nominate or to nominate others they think should be appointed to the House of Lords and the Commission assesses all the nominations against the published criteria.

    Eight new non-party-political appointments, recommended by the Commission, were announced in 2007 (six on 15 February and two on 18 October).  They joined the seven announced on  3 May 2006 and those in 2005 ( two on 22 March and five on 22 July).  Seven were previously  announced on 1 May 2004 and the first fifteen appointees were  announced in April 2001.

    This website also sets out information about:

    the Appointments Commission, including the Commission’s role, membership, code of practice and register of interests;

      

    the nomination process. You can read the updated information pack [114KB DOC] in its entirety or go straight to the introductory letter, the nominations process, the criteria the Commission will use in assessing nominations and the  nomination form [44KB DOC].

    Please use the website feedback form to give us your comments on the work we do. And, of course, may I encourage you to think about nominating someone – it might be yourself - who you think meets our criteria?

    Dennis Stevenson

    Chairman of the Appointments Commission "

  9. No, for he is not a peer of the realm.

    And he is a beardy ex-hippie.

  10. No, Sir Richard Branson cannot sit in the House of Lords.

    best of luck to you!

  11. Isnt he a sir not a lord?

  12. No

    -SS (:-Smiling Star-:)

  13. Not unless he is created a peer. he's a knight, although many Lords have a Knighthood they have also been created life peers (with the title Lord). Lords must be British or Irish citizens, no other Commonwealth countries are eligible (like they are for other honours).

  14. let me know when he does. I'll be in the sitting.

  15. if he wants

  16. He can sit anywhere he likes

    He has money

    He has fame

    He has recognition from the british monarchy

    BUT

    He will always be an entrprenuerial upstart yoa wouldn;t wanna p**son if he was on fire

    Notice how he lives on necca island not here

    One rule for THEM on rule for ME

    A role model for all ex commy country gangsters ereywhere me thinks

    RICHARD BRANSON

    d**k BRANSON

    yeah

    I'd rather put my d**k in a jar of branson than condone this guys shallow narrow unsustainable brand of bubble gum trabsient politics !

  17. no because he is not a lord but he will be shortly

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 17 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions