Can you describe the opening ceremony of the Olympics ?

Question

is its logo realistic ?

Answer 1

it was beyond minds it was amazing  

Answer 2

describe

no

but impression

yes

its the east asia where man can teach the wisdom and life morals and ethics

were you see 1 400 000 000 pple with the least percent of crime and the jobs are done pollution gets to minimum after being the worst in polluted cities they managed to win the challenge

the most difficult land to plant they just do not go to others to feed the hungry mouthes

they were attacked and were lost wars but they did not big any thing they just closed their walls on them and only opened it once the world accepts them as a major power

they called for arabs to be their friends as sudan and others

they said we buy your petrol not sreal it or made war for it

they had a challenge and won it

Answer 3

It was incredible , I loved it but I don`t really know about its logo.

:o)

Answer 4

it was so great ..

tthe logo was about bringing the world together as u said

they were saying me and u together .. one family.. one dream

i liked it

Answer 5

I didn't really watch it.. I only saw a little bit of it..

but it was awesome :)

About the logo I didn't know anything. But I don't think that's realistic, it's only a "dream", which is very hard to get true.

How you said, Putin was watching during Russia fighted with Georgia.. and a lot of humans died.. so do they call that "Our Dreams, Our Goals"... if so, then no thank you.. let us have our "old" dreams and goals..  

Answer 6

Great ..

Answer 7

Spectacular,fascinating,Amazing,Unpredic...

the logo is ay kalam 3ashan el nas te7ebohom bas

Answer 8

It's just propoganda.  but it was well done...ppl. are too obsessed w/ those imaginary lines called borders to have the kind of world peace alluded to in the opening olympics.  Anything CAN be done but the world is just not ready for that yet, although I wish it could happen now.

Answer 9

It was spectacular and just great.  They really made a great effort, but one of the drawbacks that I saw was their concentrating on Chinese history.  Though extremely interesting, the opening ceremony of such an international event should feature some shots from the the culture of the 5 continents. Otherwise it was just amazing, particularly the way those involved were moving with great harmony and the effect of the flying carpet was unique.  Actually it's a mixture of the romantic and imaginary.

About their motto and the breaking news occurring at the same time, well, it's really a pity and it shows that these mottoes denote hope to change a world that is governed by the laws of the jungle. Ironically, the more civilized and advanced it becomes,  the more destructive it becomes.  

Answer 10

the opening ceremony in technological manners were fantastic,

in art talk, the expressions and the methods they used to convey those "wanted" meanings  were excellent

It changed a lot of peoples view about china, specially in the west and in china itself.

politically speaking there was a lot of political remarks from many countries, and from the way the TV director chooses his shoots.

For china ppl, i m sure they are flattered with it and they actually deserve it.

about the meanings (our goals, our dreams) it was not a msg to unify the world as it was a remark from china to welcome the world, and give them a new image of china, we (including me) raised on one image of Chinese ppl laying on the floor addicted to Opium drugs, eating suffocated ducks and all with the same clothes.

it was not about motivating the world to be in peace as much as it was to motivate the Chinese for their new future, and leave their dark history of occupation and humiliation.

and it could be a hint to tell US and the West to coop with them instead of confronting them.

about Georgia, and Russia, Actually Georgia (according to the news) started massive bombing actions against Russian forces in southern Stacia, and then the Russian replied, as they all ready posses a strong military units. regardless who is right or wrong, Georgia is  just trying to leave the east camp (russia) and join the Nato, on the other hand russia sees this and offensive act and a real threat to its national security as it will lead the nato militry bases beside russian lands directly. south ostesia has a totally different agenda, but their agenda is closer with the russian one.

=============================

but refering to what you are actually asking about: to form one world means the domination of one force over all other forces. the domination of one nation over others, so what was motivating other confronting nations idiologically will simply decompose and will be trasnformed into another form of idiology. and this called defeat.