As I understand ReSPs, the high income parents contribute some money and *don't* receive a tax credit for it. Then, 18 years later, the low-income kid "receives" the money (principal and interest) as income and pays minimal or no tax on it, because they're poor and pay tuition. But how is this different from just buying a security, waiting 18 years, and then giving its future value as a gift to your kid? No one pays tax on the first $10k of income; so a $5000 annual gift to your otherwise-poor kid would be tax-free, which is no worse off than a $5000 RESP payment to the kid.
So the kid doesn't get any benefit. And, as the parent, you didn't get a write-off 18 years earlier, so you don't get any benefit. The education grants are good, but am I missing something? Where is the tax deferrment?
Tags: