Championships devalued?

Question

I remember Hogan holding the title for 4 years.

Bruno for 7 seven years.

Maybe that's a bit excessive........but they should do like 2 year reigns. These days they change titles way too often. JBL had an 8 month reign, & they said it was like the longest reign in 10 years.

& they shouldn't have 3 different world titles. That makes each title less meaningful. Should they reunite Raw & Smackdown? (& get rid of ECW?)

They did that before...........but they guys were traveling & wrestling twice per week; a lot of work.

& it's good that they have shorter matches now.........people dont have long attention spans for hour matches.

Answer 1

Well, i guess things change. I guess your a classic WWE match lover. But, nowadays when a person holds the title for like 1 month, people are tired of him. Why is that ? I don't get tired of it. I think it gives the title more value.

I agree, I am happy the matches have shortened in length. Back in the days they used to go on for over a hour. Which was ridicoulus ....... Anyways, we can't change the past or the future.......  

Answer 2

I think they should keep the World Heavyweight Championship and the WWE Championship but get rid of the ECW Championship, its a joke