Question:

Chile vs. Peru – Half Time Report – Copa America 2011

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike


Chile vs. Peru – Half Time Report – Copa America 2011
Chile and Peru faced each other in the last and final round of the Copa http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Chile-c2871 or Peru is going to top the group as
http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Uruguay-c3035 only managed to get two points out of the two games that they played.
Chile’s coach Claudio http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Sergio-c33030 Markarian played a 4-5-1 formation. Both the coaches added an extra man in the midfield to help the team dominate the game in the midfield. While Chile gave up on a defender,
Peru gave up on a striker to add an extra man to the midfield.
The Chilean goal stopper http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Pinto-c30032 featured in between the sticks and he was aided by three defenders. Estrada, Ponce and Jara were the players who featured in the defensive roles.
The five midfielders were Carmona, Fierro, Silva, Beausejour and Jimenez. These five players were positioned in the midfield in such a way that Carmona and Fierra played in the holding midfield role while Silva and Beausejour played on the flanks. Jimenez
featured in the centre of the pitch as a centre midfielder.
Huazo and Paredes were given the opportunity to score as both of them played in the striking position. http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Alexis-Sánchez-c4979 was dropped for this game as Chile had no threat of not qualifying in the quarter finals.
Peru played Libman in between the two sticks and he was aided by four defenders. Ramos, Revoredo, Acasiete and Carmona featured in the defensive positions.
The five midfielders for Peru meant that there was one holding midfielder, two central midfielders and two players on the flanks to aid the sole striker. The holding midfielder was Gonzales while the central midfielders were Guevara and Ballon. Corzo and
Chiroque played on the flanks.
The sole striker for the Peru team was Ruidiaz.
Peru were the weaker side of the match but after their performances in the first two fixtures of the competition, they were expected to do wonders. However, the first half pretty much dominated by the Chileans.
The first http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Real-c30728 chance of the game was created by Peru. It was Chiroque who stepped up during the sixth minute of the game and decided to take a shot on goal from 25 yards out. His shot was perfectly taken but it flew just over the bar.
Chile came back with a quick reply during the eleventh minute. Beausejour gave a cut back pass towards http://www.senore.com/Football-soccer/Paredes-c29129 but the Chilean star couldn’t get his foot right. It was a glorious chance for Chile to score the opening goal of the game.
Chile again created a wonderful opportunity. It was Estrada who decided to take a shot from long distance. The Chilean man couldn’t get his shot on target but it was always looked threatening.
Peru were relying too much on counter attacks. Even though Chileans were barely leaving spaces at the back, Peru still got their chance during the 17th minute. Corzo received the ball on the counter attack and just when everyone thought he would
cross it in, he decided to shoot in on goal from an unusual angle. The ball couldn’t really find the target but it was a chance which Peru could take advantage from.
Both the teams tried to dominate possession throughout the first half. Chile had most of the ball and they created most of the chances with their striker falling back and collecting the ball in the midfield of six players.
Suazo had a chance to score from a volley right in front of goal. However, his volley was mishit and it went wide off the target. Suazo seemed frustrated as it was an outstanding opportunity to open the scoring.
The best chance for Peru came during the 36th minute when Guevara took a free kick which Ponce allowed to go pass him. The ball curled and almost found the back of the net. However, Pinto was present to claw it out.
The first half ended with none of the teams scoring the opener. It was quite an open game but Chile still dominated in terms of possession while Peru had everything going right for them as they relied too much on counter attacking football. 

 Tags:

   Report
SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 0 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.