Claire McCaskill & Kathleen Sibelius were considered great VP choices for Obama, yet Palin is bad? ?

Question

Help me explain how freshman senator Claire McCaskill is better or that other lady Kathleen Sibelius over Clinton

Answer 1

Neither of them had ethical investigations happening, for abuses of power.

Answer 2

they're freaking out about seeing photos of an *empowered* politically *conservative* family with so many offspring, with more to come......

Answer 3

Well, they weren't that well-considered, were they?  As in they weren't picked.  I'm from Missouri, and I assure you that McCaskill wasn't a real contender.  She's an overly ambitious, disingenuous hack with questionable ethical ties.  Sebelius is better, but lacked the experience needed on the ticket (she also proved to be very, very boring at the convention).

Palin seems to be an overly ambitious, disingenuous hack with questionable ethical ties and little experience.  So she got picked.  With, we find, very little advance vetting on the ground in Alaska.

What exactly is your complaint?

And what the heck does "much less better" mean?  How's that adult literacy program working out?

Answer 4

mccaskill is  just like obama, a U.S. hating communist pinko.  Poor choice for anything but the electric chair.

Answer 5

As a fellow Missourian, McCaskill's job is here in Missouri. She is needed here.

Besides, why should Obama make the decision of his VP based on gender. That's what McCain did.

Answer 6

Who ever said they were?  They didn't get picked VP, just like Clinton.  I haven't seen any evidence that Obama would have chosen them over Hillary Clinton.

Answer 7

Lol

Obama is the most inexperienced of all, and has literally done nothing politically except give a few speeches written by others